If you're trying to strengthen a claim about what happens when parents sing to their children (they sound different, while trying to sound the same), it does little to our argument in knowing what happens when no child is present.
Compare that with D, which gives an explanation to the question of how the parents are, in fact, sounding different, thereby strengthening the conclusion.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
2 comments
Edited your title since you had the wrong section (Psych researchers LR is Section 4!)
If you're trying to strengthen a claim about what happens when parents sing to their children (they sound different, while trying to sound the same), it does little to our argument in knowing what happens when no child is present.
Compare that with D, which gives an explanation to the question of how the parents are, in fact, sounding different, thereby strengthening the conclusion.