Subscription pricing
When answering questions on the logical reasoning section, I found myself having a difficult time distinguishing between common answer types. I feel as if my problem is that I don't know the clear cut distinction between these types. They are as follows:
Would someone be willing to help me out with this? Whenever I am doing a PT I often find myself delving into these answer stems for too long.
Thank you!
0
2 comments
Thank you so much @marine4life6798246 :smile:
I think the easiest way to look at these, at least for myself, is to change the term "claim" into conclusion.
It is cited as some evidence against the conclusion
It is cited as a direct contradiction of the conclusion
etc.
Then you really just have to know what the conclusion is they are referring to.
Evidence against - Just evidence that works against the conclusion/weakens conclusion
Direct contradiction - Likely the opposite of what the conclusion says (It did happen VS It didn't happen)
Fact supporting - really isn't this just a premise? A fact that supports a conclusion
Attempt to undermine - Works against the conclusion/weakens conclusion
Reason for the claim - again really isn't this just a premise?
If you can break it down like this - and then look at the stimulus and decide what it is doing to the conclusion it becomes much easier.