I have a sincere doubt on diagramming 'OR'....

A or B is it incorrect to diagram as A --> /B , B --> /A

i know group 3 indicators are diagrammed as /A --> B , /B --> A

but would it make any difference if I simply drew A --> /B

been racking my brain about this....

vini

0

5 comments

  • Sunday, Oct 22 2017

    aha!!! gotcha!!

    awesome you guys!!

    thanks heaps!

    0
  • Sunday, Oct 22 2017

    @yeshesvini75 said:

    A --> B

    B --> A

    do not comprehend how this allows for the possibility that both are out

    These conditionals leave the possibility for both to be out because if you fail the sufficient condition by placing A out, then the rule becomes irrelevant allowing B to be placed out (or in).

    A --> B is the correct way to diagram "or", because no matter what if you place one letter out, the other must be in (or both could be in).

    2
  • Sunday, Oct 22 2017

    Because not B or not A doesn't trigger anything.

    1
  • Sunday, Oct 22 2017

    A --> B

    B --> A

    do not comprehend how this allows for the possibility that both are out

    0
  • Sunday, Oct 22 2017

    Very, very incorrect!

    Your suggested diagram allows for the possibility that both are out, while "or" means one has to be in!

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?