Subscription pricing
Hey all,
I am consistently missing 2-3 on each section. So no obvious weaknesses are popping out to me. Still, I need to make the jump from the high160s to mid-170's consistently. Who has done this? How does one do this? Lol any help appreciated.
Thanks 7sage (3(/p)
0
4 comments
@jessebtrujillo731 said:
@jessebtrujillo731
Thanks everyone. Is it true that top scorers usually get -0 on Games?
Some top scorers get -0/-1 on games, yes. It is widely held that this is the "easiest section to improve" so people drill them obsessively because it's the easiest section to see your score move in.
However like @jessebtrujillo731 mentioned a -2/-3 in RC is less common, so that is definitely a strength of yours.
Consider this though, -3 on each real section is -12. On a hard to average test you are hitting 170. On an easy test you'd drop to maybe a 168. So YOU are a high scorer!
@jessebtrujillo731
Thanks everyone. Is it true that top scorers usually get -0 on Games?
Your "obvious weakness" is LG.
-2 or -3 on RC is amazing. -2 on LR is really good; odds are you're usually just missing curve breakers. Get that LG score perfect like it should be. It'd be a shame for someone scoring as high as you to not have a perfect logic games score.
@jessebtrujillo731 said:
Hey all,
I am consistently missing 2-3 on each section. So no obvious weaknesses are popping out to me. Still, I need to make the jump from the high160s to mid-170's consistently. Who has done this? How does one do this? Lol any help appreciated.
Thanks 7sage (3(/p)
Are you missing a particular type of question more frequently?
Are you missing questions in a certain part of the test more frequently?
Have you looked at the analytics?