1 comments

  • Friday, Jul 20, 2018

    I think D is mostly wrong because the argument doesn't rest on people actually getting any grants, it's all hypothetical.

    Grants require clear projections

    investigators ignore anything not directly investigated

    serendipity can no longer play a role

    Also the conclusion says "under the prevailing circumstances"

    1
You've reached the end of the comments.

Confirm action

Are you sure?