Subscription pricing
Why not D? if (D) wasn't true and not all scientific investigators received a grant, then wouldn't that mean serendipity can play a role in scientific discovery? Since they would not have to make clear projections and disregard info not directly related to their research.
Admin note: edited title
0
1 comments
I think D is mostly wrong because the argument doesn't rest on people actually getting any grants, it's all hypothetical.
Grants require clear projections
investigators ignore anything not directly investigated
serendipity can no longer play a role
Also the conclusion says "under the prevailing circumstances"