this method is very good and its an enlightening way of approaching NA which is just a weird task that we arent familiar with prior to studying the LSAT but this will not substitute reading for argument reasoning. sometimes getting to focused on question type strategies makes us lazier when reading the stimulus really try to read to UNDERSTAND the argument in its most basic form do the work upfront kind of like with RC. LSAT loophole does a good job of teaching test takers how to understand the stimulus.
I improved significantly by treating Necessary Assumption questions as a must be true question in the context that for the author to be able to make their conclusion which of these answer choices must be true? Thinking about it like that helped me more than the negation test.
Yes, we can tackle Necessary Assumption questions as MBT. Necessary assumption must hold and needed in order for us to have the argument. We are still trying to complete the argument with necessary assumption and the answer choice must be necessary.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
4 comments
this method is very good and its an enlightening way of approaching NA which is just a weird task that we arent familiar with prior to studying the LSAT but this will not substitute reading for argument reasoning. sometimes getting to focused on question type strategies makes us lazier when reading the stimulus really try to read to UNDERSTAND the argument in its most basic form do the work upfront kind of like with RC. LSAT loophole does a good job of teaching test takers how to understand the stimulus.
I improved significantly by treating Necessary Assumption questions as a must be true question in the context that for the author to be able to make their conclusion which of these answer choices must be true? Thinking about it like that helped me more than the negation test.
Yes, we can tackle Necessary Assumption questions as MBT. Necessary assumption must hold and needed in order for us to have the argument. We are still trying to complete the argument with necessary assumption and the answer choice must be necessary.
You sure can!