The argument concludes that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced. And why is that? Because these wheat strains will play host to R. bacteria. Now what is the argument assuming? It seems to assume that this R. bacteria will produce fixed nitrogen, which is stated in the first sentence to be essential, or necessary for the wheat to grow. If the R. bacteria fails to produce fixed nitrogen, it is not necessarily true that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
1 comments
The argument concludes that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced. And why is that? Because these wheat strains will play host to R. bacteria. Now what is the argument assuming? It seems to assume that this R. bacteria will produce fixed nitrogen, which is stated in the first sentence to be essential, or necessary for the wheat to grow. If the R. bacteria fails to produce fixed nitrogen, it is not necessarily true that the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.