So, I am not sure if this is 100% right but I will say that I went from getting 0 correct (LIKE SERIOUSLY 0 CORRECT LOL) to all NA correct.
The approach that I did is read the stimulus, found the conclusion, and then started going through the answer choices. What was I looking for in the AC? I was looking for a AC that will support the conclusion.
For example: BECAUSE THIS AC HAPPENED, then this conclusion was able to happen. Due to the argument depending on this AC for the conclusion to be valid.
Also what helped me figure this out is work backgrounds on NA. After I got them ALL wrong, I would see the correct answer and see how that would fit the stimulus. That is how I learned how to approach them.
Practice translation of your stimulus (or really anything you read on the test)
Look for something that intuitively must be true
When in doubt, negate the answer
Practice negating answers
I think the first and last points are the most important and also the most severely underdressed. If you're not comfortable with these skills, you haven't done them enough. If they are still things you have to consciously make sure you do correctly, at some point the test will make you fail to do them. Any other performance activity (learning a song on the piano, swinging a golf club, driving a car, etc.) takes a lot of reps before we can perform with any semblance of proficiency. In the ideal state, you don't remember to negate properly (or translate, employ question type strategies, correctly diagram, etc.)... you just do them because you can't do it any differently. IMO you can't get around the repetition requirement.... you gotta put in the work.
I like to look at NA as a must be true. They can be more subtle, but the correct NA AC is the only one that must be true.
I have tried the negation approach, negating each answer choice and choosing the one that destroys the argument, but I have found this to be somewhat confusing and much more time-consuming.
Give the MBT approach a try, see if it "clicks" for you. Best of luck!
One big advice I can give for situations in which you are maybe stuck within two choices, run the negation of the answer choice and see if that opposite would destroy the argument, if so then that is the necessary assumption, because if the opposite was true then the argument collapses.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
4 comments
So, I am not sure if this is 100% right but I will say that I went from getting 0 correct (LIKE SERIOUSLY 0 CORRECT LOL) to all NA correct.
The approach that I did is read the stimulus, found the conclusion, and then started going through the answer choices. What was I looking for in the AC? I was looking for a AC that will support the conclusion.
For example: BECAUSE THIS AC HAPPENED, then this conclusion was able to happen. Due to the argument depending on this AC for the conclusion to be valid.
Also what helped me figure this out is work backgrounds on NA. After I got them ALL wrong, I would see the correct answer and see how that would fit the stimulus. That is how I learned how to approach them.
Practice translation of your stimulus (or really anything you read on the test)
Look for something that intuitively must be true
When in doubt, negate the answer
Practice negating answers
I think the first and last points are the most important and also the most severely underdressed. If you're not comfortable with these skills, you haven't done them enough. If they are still things you have to consciously make sure you do correctly, at some point the test will make you fail to do them. Any other performance activity (learning a song on the piano, swinging a golf club, driving a car, etc.) takes a lot of reps before we can perform with any semblance of proficiency. In the ideal state, you don't remember to negate properly (or translate, employ question type strategies, correctly diagram, etc.)... you just do them because you can't do it any differently. IMO you can't get around the repetition requirement.... you gotta put in the work.
I like to look at NA as a must be true. They can be more subtle, but the correct NA AC is the only one that must be true.
I have tried the negation approach, negating each answer choice and choosing the one that destroys the argument, but I have found this to be somewhat confusing and much more time-consuming.
Give the MBT approach a try, see if it "clicks" for you. Best of luck!
One big advice I can give for situations in which you are maybe stuck within two choices, run the negation of the answer choice and see if that opposite would destroy the argument, if so then that is the necessary assumption, because if the opposite was true then the argument collapses.