1 comments

  • Sunday, May 08 2022

    If you are talking about the question about popular uprisings vs sunspot activity, below are my thought process:

    Phenomenon: occurrence of popular uprising & near-maximum sunspot activity

    Further observation of the phenomenon:

    heavy sunspot activity - sharp rise ions in air - make ppl anxious and irritable

    Conclusion: likely sunspot activity is a factor triggering popular uprisings.

    Basically, author pointed a correlation of two things and a link of causes/effects to discuss why these two things are correlated and that is one is possibly a factor of causes for another.

    The correct answer E demonstrated a correlation between productivity & corner offices with more windows. By providing a casual relationship of "abundant alert light - more alert," it concluded that the great productivity is "probably" "at least in part a result" of the corner offices.

    While C also talks about a correlation between cold weather & rise in fuel prices, its casual relationship is more tight (single factor) and direct. Moreover, its conclusion is a prediction instead of explanation of the past/present. If C would be right, the stimulus should conclude as "Therefore if there's a popular uprising next year, it would be a result of the heavy sunspot activity."

    Hope this helps :)

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?