Cause I'm not sure it can be translated since both logical indicators indicate the sufficient condition, so you have nothing to indicate what exactly will happen if one of those conditions is triggered (Basically you only have one side of the arrow).
If A and B
A & B ->
Unless C or D
/C and /D ->
if- group 1- sufficient
unless, or - group 3 - negate sufficient
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
1 comments
Where did you get this example from?
Cause I'm not sure it can be translated since both logical indicators indicate the sufficient condition, so you have nothing to indicate what exactly will happen if one of those conditions is triggered (Basically you only have one side of the arrow).
If A and B
A & B ->
Unless C or D
/C and /D ->
if- group 1- sufficient
unless, or - group 3 - negate sufficient