Hi there :) so while I plan to answer your question specifically, I also see this as an opportunity to talk generally about important themes on the LSAT. When the author is making an evaluation, we have to ask ourselves what criteria the author used and whether that criterion sufficiently warrants the evaluation. Author makes an evaluation that the straight handles are better than S-shaped handles for preventing spinal injuries based on the criterion regarding compression stress. We have to assume that what we know about the relative discrepancy regarding compression stress is enough to warrant the evaluation that one is better at preventing spinal injuries. For us to validate that assumption we need to confirm that there are no other factors that could also lead to spinal injuries.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
1 comments
Hi there :) so while I plan to answer your question specifically, I also see this as an opportunity to talk generally about important themes on the LSAT. When the author is making an evaluation, we have to ask ourselves what criteria the author used and whether that criterion sufficiently warrants the evaluation. Author makes an evaluation that the straight handles are better than S-shaped handles for preventing spinal injuries based on the criterion regarding compression stress. We have to assume that what we know about the relative discrepancy regarding compression stress is enough to warrant the evaluation that one is better at preventing spinal injuries. For us to validate that assumption we need to confirm that there are no other factors that could also lead to spinal injuries.