User Avatar
•

Edited saturday, sep 27

😖 Frustrated

Expected Accuracy makes NO SENSE

The expected accuracy feature, which plays into analytics and priority tags, makes no sense. Say I have consistently scored 155-160 on all of my PTs, but my goal score is a 170, how am I supposed to reach that if it's giving me priorities based on other people in my current score range??? It could say that I have a "low priority' for a specific tag, just because I'm on level with people in my range, but if that range is lower than I am aiming for, it's not a low priority. This feature should be completely overhauled with the option to specifically choose a score range goal, and then it shows the accuracy needed to obtain that range.

If I am misunderstanding something, please help explain JY #feedback

5

3 comments

  • J.Y. Ping Founder
    Monday, Sep 29

    We're changing this soon to use goal score as the basis. I'm expecting the feature to go live this coming week.

    7
  • Sunday, Sep 28

    I'm with you. Almost everything is at a low priority for me (aside from one tag in LR which is medium) which doesn't help me focus on certain questions

    0
  • Edited Saturday, Sep 27

    I dont see the issue with using the expected accuracy of people in your current score range to assign priorities. At a higher score the expected accuracy will be higher for every question type, so I don't see why the priorites would change much if at all.

    For example lets say in your highest priority question type you are 10% less accurate than others in your score range, you would be even less accurate in that question type compared to others in a higher score range. Now, Im sure accuracy on each question type does not increase uniformly with score, but I dont think slight variations would change the priorities.

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?