Check out powerscore's crystal ball. They predict what the upcoming LSAT administrations will look like and provide tests and sections that have similar questions. They've been accurate in the past.

@jwn1060 "Given the information in the passage" is definitely a red herring. I'm trying to come up with a rule to deal with this if I come to it in the future, but it's difficult...

This answer only makes sense to me with the "most" part of it. I don't see how you can say that not accepting one claim means you must accept another. However, this is the closest of all the ACs to the principle in the argument because it removes the other hypothesis. At least, that's what I think. All the ACs suck

For (D), how do we know that dust = all debris? Is this just a reasonable assumption OR are we supposed to remember that volcanic eruptions emit dust and sulfuric acid droplets? In that case, couldn't the debris include sulfuric acid? (D) is still the best AC option, but does it feel like a stretch to jump from dust to debris for anyone else?

Try creating rules for yourself to utilize the next time you come to the same issues

@christinabarta1900 Jumping in here. It may not be a NA but if the other waters are the same stillness as Shooter's Island + the correct AC, it would be a VERY weak argument because we don't have anything, as mentioned, that separates Shooter's from the other islands. If this were the case, we would need something to separate it because of the premise detailing the vast difference in juveniles between Shooter's and the other islands

@Kevin_Lin Thanks for the response, Kevin! I'm referring to the 'why you must skip questions on the LSAT' lesson (https://7sage.com/lessons/next-steps/resources-for-taking-simulated-lsats/why-you-must-skip-questions-on-the-lsat).

It's possible I misinterpreted it! Anyway, I'll try out your suggested strategy on my next section.

I'm still having trouble with this question, got it right in regular time but changed it to E in BR. Would changing (E) to "presumes, without providing justification, that the number and variety of great artworks already in the world affects the ability for aesthetic fulfillment derivable from any contemporary artwork" make it a correct AC?

Following

I usually use both. The written explanations often don't have the full, in-depth explanation that the videos do. The videos sometimes have tips to keep in mind for future questions which is also helpful. I use the written explanations kind of as a precursor for the video explanations.

@angelaavonce132 a-> b, a-> c, there b <-s-> c

It could help to focus on drilling only questions that you got incorrect to hone in on what you need to improve on. That helped me a lot

I'm with you. Almost everything is at a low priority for me (aside from one tag in LR which is medium) which doesn't help me focus on certain questions

What does link assumption mean in the analytics? Does it mean that the author makes an obvious jump from a premise to a conclusion?

I don't get how you can require an expectation...

How can people tell that "your friend would not expect you to be there if you felt ill" was a premise? It just felt like additional context

I was able to get this question right because all the other ACs were bad, but it seems like the stimulus states that chimpanzees have no language similar to humans. Yet the right AC says "there is no clearcut linguistic implications for chimpanzees." Isn't not having a language similar to humans a linguistic implication and a specific one at that?

I'm in NYC and planning to take it in August. A study group would be helpful