Subscription pricing
When I change my goal from 170 to 175 the analytics completely change on what areas of LR I should prioritizing. Why wouldn't they be the same, except with larger gaps that need to be made up? Is there some underlying metric, like people who get 175 are better at conditional reasoning and Link Assumption, and people who get 170 are better at SA and Parallel Flaw? I guess this is an RRE question, but my percentages there are good, so I should be able to figure this out.
1
1 comments
The metric prioritizes skills where you are missing a greater amount of qs than the average. If you are meeting the average at 170, it's not as big of a priority. When you change it to 175, your average is now below average and questions like causal reasoning, link assumption, etc are much more common on the LSAT than paradoxes for example
If you get 70% right on causal reasoning (~20/test) and 70% on math (~2/test) you're going to get more questions right bumping that 70% to an 80% on causal than math.