Opt-out makes more sense to me. It's hard for me to think of a reasons why I wouldn't personally want that data on here as part of my analytics, and to have the questions marked as no longer fresh.

The conclusion "Moral virtue is not among the characteristics that we admire most" gets "not Moral virtue" from the first premise and "admire most" from the second premise. (A) connects the two premises allowing the conclusion, and (B) does not as "Bravery and creativity" being connected back to morally virtuous doesn't get us any closer to being able to say what characteristics we admire. (B) only deals with the first premise and we need the two connected.

The power score predictions video is supposed to be posted at some point today. Good luck!

They work about the same with the same material. The only thing that threw me off is I got used to highlighting words by double clicking on them during 7sage drills and PTs, and double clicking doesn’t work on lawhub. Other than that, nothing else seems to work in a different way that I have found.

It got me in the habit of keeping a tally of questions I wasn't positive about as I went, which was good, but after a while I got annoyed with the number of things I had to click through at the end of a test, and since I already had my tally anyway, I disabled it.

I took the test in person last week, but for the writing section at home, it would not let me have any of my external monitors hooked up. I ended up just using a laptop, without my keyboard or mouse, in my kid's room to not set off any alarms about the extra screens sitting around me in my normal setup.

I've noticed #1 as well. Doesn't happen too often, but very confusing when it does.

This may be the sort of thing where enough data doesn't exist to be able to predict, but would it be possible to put a non-traditional flag or 10+ years work experience or something similar on the predictor? I looked on lds and the data for non-traditional students there is very thin.

Very helpful. Thanks!