Down = be insanely skeptical of the answer choices; answer choices should have low burden of proof based on stimulus & should be able to match it to specific parts of the stimulus
Up = be insanely skeptical of the stimulus; answer choice should have huge effect on the strength of the stimulus's argument
main problem with this kind of typology that I have is that I don't really think NAs belong to the latter group, the choice reflects less an impact on the stimulus than a kind of MBT equivalent.
16
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
3 comments
so, what I gathered:
Down = be insanely skeptical of the answer choices; answer choices should have low burden of proof based on stimulus & should be able to match it to specific parts of the stimulus
Up = be insanely skeptical of the stimulus; answer choice should have huge effect on the strength of the stimulus's argument
main problem with this kind of typology that I have is that I don't really think NAs belong to the latter group, the choice reflects less an impact on the stimulus than a kind of MBT equivalent.