Is it ok that this author does not ever directly cite or acknowledge any perspectives? I know the earlier page on this says you can paraphrase, cite or say things like "opponents of this view....".
20
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
13 comments
It's interesting that neither of them use the highlighters... I am always putting the highlighters to use!
Are we allowed to include personal anecdotes?
Found this much more helpful than the previous lesson. It was also good to not see someone use Grammarly
Can we submit one of our practices to get feedback on what to improve? Are we allowed to have Grammarly enabled when we take the actual LSAT writing?
Should we aim to include a counter argument?
Is it ok that this author does not ever directly cite or acknowledge any perspectives? I know the earlier page on this says you can paraphrase, cite or say things like "opponents of this view....".