Subscription pricing
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-2-question-17/
I feel like i am almost there with S.A. questions.
Thank you J.Y.!
But I had some major problems diagraming the conclusion of this question.
Can someone please help?
Premise: For W/O health, happiness is not obtainable. Lawgic translation: negate sufficient
OH-->HE
Conclusion: One should never sacrifice ones health in order to acquire money …. ?!?!?!
thats as far as i got with this question.
Please help!
Thank you in advance!
0
2 comments
Oh hi!
I have all the reasoning down and i know exactly what the question entails, i just really wanted to know if there was a way to diagram that statement and i was missing it?
Thank you though!! :)
I don't have access to the question, so I'm not sure I have enough information. But as for diagramming:
"For without health, happiness is not obtainable."
No health -> No happiness
or the contrapositive:
If I'm happy -> I must be healthy
The conclusion in your post does not really lend itself to diagramming. I can take a look at the entire question if you'd like, but I'd need you to message me the details of the question.