3 comments

  • Sunday, May 18 2014

    That's December 2006 test. I just could not understand what that argument was about. The language is so convoluted, and the subject so abstract. What do you do when something like this comes up? Do you need to come up with a hypothetical scenario to understand what they are talking about?

    0
  • Sunday, May 18 2014

    I don't see any reason why 51/3/23 would call for diagramming or negation. Could you clarify your question?

    0
  • Sunday, May 18 2014

    Which one? there are two versions of PT51

    Is it the Flaw Question or The Argument Part Question?

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?