Hi guys,

Do you have any idea how the sections affect the overall score? I just took a PT and got a 160, while completely bombing the Logic Games (like I only got 6 correct in the entire section -__-). I'm obviously drilling them and I normally don't do that badly, but I was just wondering what score you think I might expect if I were to do better in that section.

Thanks!!

0

4 comments

  • Saturday, May 31 2014

    I knew it! :)

    0
  • Saturday, May 31 2014

    Thank you CFC! I'm definitely just focusing on LGs now for this final stretch. Thanks for the link!!

    Al, he loves you too.

    0
  • Friday, May 30 2014

    @kendallcfisher45: Um, I love your dog. And I think your dog loves me.

    0
  • Friday, May 30 2014

    You can figure this out using your raw score (however many correct you got out of 101) and the scoring chart released by the LSAC. Use this link: http://www.cambridgelsat.com/resources/data/consolidated-score-conversion-charts/

    A 160 means you probably got between 73-75 questions correct. Depending on the test, if you were to get 16 correct on the Logic Games instead of 6, you're score would be around 165, 166 (depends on each individual test). If you were to get 20 correct, you'd be in the 170s.

    Long story short: a 160 with only 6 correct on the LG section is phenomenal. Logic games, because they are so repetitive, are the easiest questions to improve on. Put some practice in (7sage has awesome LG lessons!) and you have a really good chance of hitting 170+.

    2

Confirm action

Are you sure?