Hi everyone.
I might be a little late to the party with this question but does anyone have a list of conclusion types?
Perhaps even with an example Q to go along with it for reference (if not I am still appreciative).
I came across a NA Q (PT 70.1.13, for those who are interested) and I struggled with this Q until I saw a comment that cleared it all up for me. I don't want to put this person on the spot by publicizing their 7sage username but to quote their comment, " [the] key to answering this conclusion requires identifying what type of conclusion is made. in this question, the conclusion is a comparative statement about the effectiveness of an ad". As soon as I noticed that the conclusion was in fact a comparative statement, I knew what I had to do and the AC I eliminated time and time again became the obvious answer.
That is when I had my 'aha' moment! So then I said to myself we can have a causal conclusion, comparative, one based on a likelihood/probability, cause and effect, etc. "What conclusion types are there and what do I do when I have spotted it" became my train of thought.
Being that the LSAT is a marathon and not a sprint, and with that being said, I am ready to close my LR gap a bit further now. I suspect that being able to identify the type of conclusion made in an argument helps close that LR gap.
Is this something that I missed in the CC?
High LR scorers: do you implement this in your analysis of an argument?
Very interested to hear your comments because I think this is key to what is holding me back in LR.
(I also struggle with RC and I think taking this ultra-sensitive approach might help me as well.)
Thanks 7Sagers!
