Hey 7sagers,
When I have a conditional rule, do I have to test the conditional rule AND it's contrapositive in the rule testing type questions (the ones that frequently occur as the first question in each game)? Experience tells me the answer is no but I'm not sure why. Could someone explain?
Hey 7sagers,
I realize this is a very specific question but it seems to be a problem that I keep getting stuck on so I wanted to ask for advice. I have noticed this problem occurs specifically in1) sequencing/grouping games that have rules using conditional logic. 2) The questions that inevitably need to be solved using "brute force" as JY would say (can't be solved with just inferences). Essentially, how should I brute force these questions when there are conditional logic rules? Should I fulfill the sufficient condition and test? Necessary condition and let the sufficient fall away? Both?
Thanks so much!
#help: would it be wrong to consider an "enduring personal relationship" the same as a "long lasting personal relationship"?
#help Would someone be able to explain to why if A--> B and A-->C, some B are C (and vice versa)? An example would also be much appreciated!
Hello! Are there answers available for LR questions in the question bank? Or is it just my sound malfunctioning?
#help I thought it wasn't undue reliance because a prosecutor would actually be a reliable authority figure in this situation. Could someone explain why this isn't so?