Had D changed it to C, AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH :,)

Wow 5/5 on medium and hard, I was getting 1/5 on everything before :,)

It was in a written lesson, in the introduction of Flaw-Descriptive Weakening. It is a type of faulty reasoning which in simple terms is = misrepresenting opposing arguments to make easier)

Me too lol I just realized

I overcomplicate it for myself everytime lol

If you refresh the page it shows up again

First time ever getting 5/5 on hard. Practice really does help :,)

Yay !

1/5 lol, can someone reassure me that they also don't get everything correct

Because the question is asking what they disagree over. Tanner did not say anything about their skills, try to think of it like this

Tanner= Voters are able to chose a candidate --> if they watch candidates seriously

Saldana= Voters are NOT able to choose a candidate --> because cadidates with better skills win

So the main argument it is talking about is if watching the debate helps the voter choose a candidate which is Answer B. Its not about the reasoning why they will or will not be able to choose the candidate.

Hope this helps! I am also having a hard time with some questions

Why does it always say that so many people get the correct answer, should I be getting discouraged when I keep getting them wrong?