User Avatar
Alex204
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026

Discussions

User Avatar
Alex204
Tuesday, Jun 9

@16dnholli @LSATKilla87

Not sure if this will help, but I struggled with the same thing on this question. It helps to think about it like this for me:

For the sentence, “Pursuing the good life is not possible without social integrity,” the idea is that social integrity is necessary for pursuing the good life. In other words, if someone is pursuing the good life, then they must have social integrity.

So the conditional would be:

Pursuing the good life → social integrity

This means that pursuing the good life is the sufficient condition, while social integrity is the necessary condition. You can think of social integrity as the larger umbrella: pursuing the good life requires it, but social integrity may include many other things beyond just pursuing the good life.

1
User Avatar
Alex204
Thursday, May 21

@Kevin_Lin But wouldn't "no parrots are clever" ignore the possibility "that one parrot could be clever" since the lower bound for quantifier 'some' is more than one?

1
User Avatar
Alex204
Edited Thursday, May 14

me too! i think its when i don't fully complete the lessons in the study plan it changes so technically im not behind but i would rather see what haven't done and keep the lessons as is without them shifting

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?