User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Joined
Apr 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Yesterday

I got it correct but hesitated on answer A because it started with "in general"... I feel like in several previous lessons we've been able to cross out answer choices because they say "in general" -- is that not the case here?

1
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
5 days ago

Might be a dumb question, but why is there so much emphasis on "premise > conclusion" and "phenomenon > hypothesis"? Is there a major difference or can I just think of them as the same thing?

1
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Tuesday, May 26

Just curious, is it okay to read the written explanation for some of these lessons as opposed to watching the video? Reading is faster, and I find I'm sometimes more attentive when actively reading than when I'm watching the videos.

3
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Friday, May 22

Got it right but I had to guess between C and D and D felt stronger but I couldn't explain why. Is the reason why C is wrong essentially the formal argument flaw "all before most"?

Like if it was "most before all", (C -m> WD > FA) then this would be valid, right?

1
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Saturday, May 9

Would it be helpful if I wrote these down as flashcards with the typical question stem on one side and the correct answer critera / key tactics on the other?

I'd love to automatically have the answer criteria / tactics come to mind when I read the question stem every time, but I'm curious how much the question stem can deviate for the same type of question (which would make the flashcards less helpful)

6
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Saturday, May 2

In the explanation for #1, the phrasing "And, since “some” statements are reversible, we also know that some things that inspire awe in children are politically unpopular." is really confusing me.

I totally understand "some" statements are reversible, however when it appears in a chain that also has a solid arrow, I find it hard to reverse the statement...

unpopular ←s→ trucks → inspire awe in children

... Reading this, it feels wrong to go backwards on the arrow between "trucks" and "inspire awe in children", since that arrow doesn't go both ways. Maybe it's because of all the sufficienty-necessity drills, but I don't get how we are now able to move against the arrow -- can someone please explain how I'm getting this mixed up?

1
User Avatar
LSATKilla87
Monday, Apr 20

@pinky Do you think there will be testing dates in July? My understanding was that June was the last month with testing sessions in this cycle, and the next testing dates would be in August.

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?