User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Joined
Jan 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
4 days ago

I got this one right but was 38 seconds over -- when you guys are reading the stim are you diagramming as you do it? Or only if you don't fully understand it?

I worry that on these if I don't diagram as I read I run the risk of not understanding it at first blush and then expending even more time trying to diagram on my second read... Thoughts?

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Friday, Feb 20

5/5 lfg!

2
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Wednesday, Feb 18

The moment I realized this excerpt was the conclusion I just hunted for it in the AC and got it right but I feel like that's not sustainable on the actual exam (I read the first two words on each AC and immediately discarded those that didn't say 'conclusion'). Does anyone else relate? I feel like this unit in particular relies more on pattern recognition which lends itself toward reflexively seeking an answer than combing through and doing PoE.

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Saturday, Feb 14

@Kaileavesley Same... but at least i'm like 2 mins over each one too lmao

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Sunday, Jan 18

@KevinLin yes -- at my laptop lol

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Sunday, Jan 18

Are these all interchangeable? Do we need to understand how to do all three of them? Seems like 1 and 3 are most intuitive to me...

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Saturday, Jan 17

I'm getting really stuck with group 4 negate, necessary conditionals. For question four how do we get Invited > RSVP? I think I'm getting boggled down by the double-negatives...

"NO (indicator) one is invited (idea 1) who did not RSVP (idea 2)."

So then if the rule is to pick either, negate it, and make it necessary, then wouldn't you get this breakdown?

One is invited > /RSVP

Contrapositive: RSVP > /one is invited

I realize logically this is flawed -- if one RSVPs, you could make a strong inferrence that they were invited... Am I making sense? Where am I getting crossed up?

2
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Friday, Jan 16

Anyone else feel like Damian Lillard getting the last two right?

(I was a mess questions 1-3 lol)

1
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Edited Tuesday, Jan 06

Disney argument leaves no room for error.

Tiger argument's claim, while accurate, relies on a specific instance within a larger generalization. Tigers are usually very aggressive though not always.

Trash bin relies entirely on suspicion without any tangible causal relationship. Who isn't to say that the bin was knocked over before Mr Fat Cat arrived on the scene? Is there no other time when Mr Fat Cat licks his paws?

Does this make sense?? How am I doing? Lol

7
User Avatar
AndrewPhillips
Sunday, Jan 04

Hi everyone! I'm Andrew -- likely taking in June and based in LA if anyone is looking for accountability partners/study groups? Did my undergrad at Indiana and work in entertainment

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?