But isn't it wrong to generalize here that pollack has more support amongst Liberals in general? I thought this was the right answer at first but then I thought that it would've said THE Liberals, referring to the subset of 1500 voters instead of all Liberals both in and out of this pool of people
I got this one right but was 38 seconds over -- when you guys are reading the stim are you diagramming as you do it? Or only if you don't fully understand it?
I worry that on these if I don't diagram as I read I run the risk of not understanding it at first blush and then expending even more time trying to diagram on my second read... Thoughts?
@AndrewPhillips No need for diagram here. This question is simple because only one answer delves into numbers and ratios. My general rule is to skim first and diagram second if necessary.
@AndrewPhillips I'm not diagramming. If you feel confident, don't, and jump straight to the answer choices. If you digram during the actual test it will take too long. Diagram if you are practicing and feel very stuck between answer choices or don't understand the stimulus.
Just checking the conclusions works for this question. The conclusion in the stimulus is comparative and D) is the only answer choice with such a conclusion.
dont worry about the target tbh as long as u are around 1:30-2:00 per question you will be fine cuz you can make up time on some and use more on others. I was 1:32 which is fine by me
Try mapping out the argument. I do it for every single question, and even though I go just a bit over the target time, it has helped me get it right every time.
75 comments
-13 seconds, let's go!
First of these I have gotten on time and its a level 1. Very cool.
But I don't want to try peanuts infected with aspergillus.
mannnn lemme get a para like this on the LSAT
Okay, didn't even read any of the answer choices and quickly guessed the answer that had numbers in it (similar to the stimulus).
I got it right, but...
was it because of the evidence type match rule or because God was working through me?
@SwagOD Nah I did the same. I just did shallow dips for the conclusions and D was the only one that matched the stimulus.
easy
side note this new user interface SUCKS
@AutumnKelly9 real i hate that i can't cross out ACs as easily but gotta get ready for the new LSAT formatting ig
@yam SAME like why is LSAC making things more complicated than the test already is??
@AutumnKelly9 superrrrr glitchy!!
comparative babyyyyyy
But isn't it wrong to generalize here that pollack has more support amongst Liberals in general? I thought this was the right answer at first but then I thought that it would've said THE Liberals, referring to the subset of 1500 voters instead of all Liberals both in and out of this pool of people
if only questions like this one were real on the actual LSAT
I got this one right but was 38 seconds over -- when you guys are reading the stim are you diagramming as you do it? Or only if you don't fully understand it?
I worry that on these if I don't diagram as I read I run the risk of not understanding it at first blush and then expending even more time trying to diagram on my second read... Thoughts?
@AndrewPhillips No need for diagram here. This question is simple because only one answer delves into numbers and ratios. My general rule is to skim first and diagram second if necessary.
@AndrewPhillips I'm not diagramming. If you feel confident, don't, and jump straight to the answer choices. If you digram during the actual test it will take too long. Diagram if you are practicing and feel very stuck between answer choices or don't understand the stimulus.
It is so crazy how fast you have to read on these things.
Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney face off again in the 7sage curriculum
I fucking love this section
@chrisabulia hits my brain the right way
used the shallow dip method and chose the only answer in which the conclusion was comparing 2 things!!!!
Shallow dipppp!!!!
Just checking the conclusions works for this question. The conclusion in the stimulus is comparative and D) is the only answer choice with such a conclusion.
@AudreyGilmour Ohhh you're tuff. Thanks for the tip!
This was the easiest question ever. Shallow dip all the way!
Why did they portray "four hundred" in words but "300" in digits?
@VibrantXerographicAgency Just carelessness. The core curriculm is riddled with typos and other errors.
@kidkumquat That's not a typo. That's how it appears in LawHub:
@VibrantXerographicAgency That's just how it appears in LawHub. The question text is pulled from the files LSAC provides.
@Kevin_Lin Thanks for the clarification.
@VibrantXerographicAgency LSAT authors most likely did that to throw people off knowing they'd be looking for multiple sets of numbers.
@kidkumquat be nice bro
i still got target time but i was thinking theres no way this question could be that easy after having this lesson full of all hard qs
lvl 1 difficulty in the bag... oooo chat let me not crash out but use this as a stepping stone to ace the harder ones
I feel like this should have been so easy but I still was 34 seconds slower than the target
dont worry about the target tbh as long as u are around 1:30-2:00 per question you will be fine cuz you can make up time on some and use more on others. I was 1:32 which is fine by me
Don't sweat that 34 seconds is nothing you can't make up for in other questions.
This one felt harder than the last one and I almost picked A. Wtf
Try mapping out the argument. I do it for every single question, and even though I go just a bit over the target time, it has helped me get it right every time.
I wish all of them were like this :)
it took me 15 lessons but I'm so back
i b so scared on the easy ones lol. 7sage has traumatized me
real