77 comments

  • Tuesday, Sep 26, 2023

    this was too obvious I thought they were tricking me

    111
    Friday, Apr 19, 2024

    the way this test gives us trust issues

    17
    Sunday, May 19, 2024

    Same.

    2
  • Friday, Oct 11, 2024

    this question was too easy that i wasted time overthinking it... i have trust issues with the lsat

    56
    Tuesday, Jan 21, 2025

    (Although I know that some people might have got this question wrong) I totally agree with the question (even this section) being easy and my confidence was diminished from the previous sections...ugh💀

    0
    Saturday, Jan 18, 2025

    ME TOOOOOOOOOO rip :(

    0
  • Tuesday, Jun 25, 2024

    that felt toooo easy I was sus

    43
    Monday, Jul 8, 2024

    I was in way too deep on this one.

    3
    Sunday, Jun 30, 2024

    Same lol, I wasted so much time thinking I had missed some trick

    6
  • Thursday, Mar 20, 2025

    i b so scared on the easy ones lol. 7sage has traumatized me

    42
    Saturday, Mar 22, 2025

    real

    4
  • Friday, Mar 6

    if only questions like this one were real on the actual LSAT

    33
  • Monday, Jul 21, 2025

    This was the easiest question ever. Shallow dip all the way!

    24
  • Tuesday, Jun 9

    easy

    side note this new user interface SUCKS

    16
    Wednesday, Jun 10

    @akelly9 real i hate that i can't cross out ACs as easily but gotta get ready for the new LSAT formatting ig

    4
    Monday, Jun 22

    @yam SAME like why is LSAC making things more complicated than the test already is??

    1
    Friday, Jun 26

    @akelly9 superrrrr glitchy!!

    1
  • Saturday, Dec 27, 2025

    I fucking love this section

    32
    Tuesday, Apr 14

    @chrisabulia hits my brain the right way

    3
  • Friday, Jun 6, 2025

    i still got target time but i was thinking theres no way this question could be that easy after having this lesson full of all hard qs

    15
  • Monday, Mar 2

    Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney face off again in the 7sage curriculum

    14
  • Tuesday, Aug 12, 2025

    Just checking the conclusions works for this question. The conclusion in the stimulus is comparative and D) is the only answer choice with such a conclusion.

    13
    Monday, Mar 2

    @AudreyGilmour Ohhh you're tuff. Thanks for the tip!

    2
  • Sunday, Oct 12, 2025

    used the shallow dip method and chose the only answer in which the conclusion was comparing 2 things!!!!

    12
  • Friday, Apr 18, 2025

    I wish all of them were like this :)

    12
  • Thursday, Mar 13, 2025

    if all the lsat questions were like this one i'd def get 180 <333

    10
    Monday, Jul 21, 2025

    @leslymrivera524 For real!

    0
  • JacquelineMoon Independent Tutor
    Sunday, Aug 31, 2025

    Shallow dipppp!!!!

    9
  • Monday, Apr 7, 2025

    it took me 15 lessons but I'm so back

    9
  • Monday, Nov 18, 2024

    Way to easy

    9
  • Monday, Mar 2

    It is so crazy how fast you have to read on these things.

    8
  • Saturday, Jul 19, 2025

    Why did they portray "four hundred" in words but "300" in digits?

    7
    Thursday, Sep 18, 2025

    @VibrantXerographicAgency Just carelessness. The core curriculm is riddled with typos and other errors.

    -20
    Kevin_Lin Instructor
    Monday, Sep 22, 2025

    @kidkumquat That's not a typo. That's how it appears in LawHub:

    8
    Kevin_Lin Instructor
    Monday, Sep 22, 2025

    @VibrantXerographicAgency That's just how it appears in LawHub. The question text is pulled from the files LSAC provides.

    4
    Tuesday, Sep 23, 2025

    @Kevin_Lin Thanks for the clarification.

    -6
    Thursday, Oct 9, 2025

    @VibrantXerographicAgency LSAT authors most likely did that to throw people off knowing they'd be looking for multiple sets of numbers.

    8
    Tuesday, Nov 11, 2025

    @kidkumquat be nice bro

    7
  • Sunday, Jul 21, 2024

    i didn't even read the answer choice , i just immediately looked for the choice that highlighted

    A has X, B has Y, X>Y, therefore A is [insert conclusion]

    7
  • Tuesday, Feb 4, 2025

    but dad i don't waNNA eat my peanuts with aspergillus

    6
  • Sunday, Feb 25, 2024

    I was able to get this question correct 16 seconds ahead of target by just eliminating answers based off the conclusions and not seeing the word "more" except in one of the answer choices.

    6
  • Friday, Jul 10

    First of these I have gotten on time and its a level 1. Very cool.

    5
  • Wednesday, Jun 4, 2025

    lvl 1 difficulty in the bag... oooo chat let me not crash out but use this as a stepping stone to ace the harder ones

    5
  • Tuesday, Jul 23, 2024

    im right but i thought it was a tricky answer lol

    5

Confirm action

Are you sure?