@HimajaReddy It isn't a leap at all. Maybe if you don't know much about renaissance art you would think so, but painters modeled all the time. Ever seen Andrea Del Verrochio's David? Its Leonardo. Not to mention Michelangelo and Leonardo, along with Raphael himself, appearing in School of Athens. Apprentices were always expected to model when needed.

So the publishers don't warehouse printing supplies already? The books just somehow magically appear in the publisher's warehouse?

This is so funny. I think everyone over 30 gets this question easily since we grew up with cigarette ads and the debates around banning them. But for younger people its a bit tougher to see the argument.

I wasn't happen with this explanation, and I think it is wrong. The flaw here isn't false dichotomy, it actually is casual/conditional flaw. False dichotomy =

“It treats the two options presented as though they were the only options.”

This question’s flaw =

“It overlooks an alternative possibility.”

Don't be afraid to use PoE. I had no idea why A was right, but I used PoE and couldn't eliminate A.

I think a Loophole explanation is better here. "What if dairy has some health benefits?" Or: "What if eliminating dairy has negative health effects?"

Nice theory explanations here if you find that helpful. In TIMED conditions, you can use PoE to quickly eliminate and get to E, which is the correct answer.

The stim isn't saying that music is not art, it is saying that there are aesthetic features in music that are not shared with visual arts such as painting or sculpture. For example, romantic music shares some aesthetics with romantic art.

B can be eliminated easily because what if endangered species survived in zoos? Endangered species not surviving in the forests doesn't mean they won't survive elsewhere.

The LSAT writers are really into brown dwarfs

@hannahhuynh What's the point of you sharing this?

This is a trickier question than Kevin's explanation makes it appear. Kevin seems to know the question is referring to the discovery of Neanderthals during Darwin's time. Where I got confused, is because the first paragraph also mentions the discovery of earlier hominids. These later discoveries then increased our knowledge of earlier hominids. How are we supposed to know the question is only referring to the Neanderthal discovery and not the other discoveries mentioned in the same paragraph?

@Remember_Iryna_Zarutska The parallel section is extremely helpful. I am 100% on parallel questions now.

@KevinBoudreau No offense, but, I really have no idea what you're going on about or how you made all of these assumptions about a simple question. Also, I highly, highly doubt we have any shared opinions.

@KevinBoudreau Nice job writing a whole bunch of words while missing the entire point.

Huge issue for me is relying on writing on the passage which is now impossible. Under timed conditions, these are very difficult to answer.

@tmehra23332 I got this question wrong, but I don't think you're explanation is great. I think D weakens because the argument is based on asserting flint is used for hunting. Your explanation leaves the argument in place, because a household flint still would not need to be polished. D just weakens the premise, it isn't really an argument breaker or powerful weakener IMO.

This question is difficult because it seems to conflate two different topics that could simultaneously be true.

@Isabella P i also read main point in my mind than purpose of passage, I think from doing so many previous questions where MP was the first question asked

I don't think this explanation is that great. If you read the last sentence of the first paragraph it points straight to E.

@Blurred_Lines If a worker creates $100 in goods, paid $10 for it, and the owner keeps $90, is that a fair exchange?

@MPFerrari There is a new translation of Vol 1 and it isn't difficult to read at all. I don't think reading Marx is like reading Hegel.

@jansen bien m belarmino same here does anyone know what flaw in reasoning causes this?

@Solu Obiorah yes

Universal in past and present=all.