- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
I missed this question because I wasn’t willing to assume that children being aggressive toward/hitting a doll was necessarily correlated with children hurting other children. This still isn’t making sense to me
@wonderingguy type sh*t
@HannahRodrigue this was a very helpful comment that made the answer make a lot more sense to me. Thank u queen
Submitted the whole drill after only answering the first question because I am an idiot. Hope this helps!
(I did get that question right tho)
I'm confused about C being the answer - the conclusion is about the exaggeration of peasants' piety. Why would I assume the clergy's documentation of a completely different group of people to be representative of their documentation of PEASANTS (a group with presumably less power/ability to correct the record)?
I struggled with this question though I ultimately got it right.
It still just doesn't make sense to me. The music having "much more" in common with jazz still doesn't mean it should be classified as jazz. I guess the point isn't that this is a fantastic argument against the stimulus, its just a "stronger" weakener than all the other options.
took way too long, but I got this thang right
Love that I got this right the first time and then got it wrong in blind review. Genius.
I had B selected as my answer choice and talked myself into answer choice E because it felt like B was introducing information not provided by the stimulus. In hindsight, THAT'S KIND OF THE POINT OF (S)/(w) SOMETIMES.
"If this were true, which one would MOST strengthen/weaken?"
RELEASE THE FIRST 3 SCORES !!!
@ronniseellison I'm not seeing a "quick view" option in 2025 - am I just missing it?
@jordkerns Very helpful assessment ! Thanks!
I ruled E out as an option because I assumed that an increased number of police is more likely to correlate with an increase of arrests/identified rate of violent crime. I guess I was supposed to assume the exact opposite?