I was thrown off during this question because only 3/5 phrases were actually highlighted in the passage for me, and I was in a time scramble. I'm not sure why but "innovators" and "conveniently" were not highlighted in the parapgrah either on the Law Hub test or in 7Sage. Why would that be the case? I lost time looking for phrases, realizing they werent highlighted, wondering why, trying ot understand if there was a mistake, all at the END of the section. Terrible.

LSAT got me feeling like I should go for a swim fr

fiction fiction fiction FICTION not biographies, not self-help, FICTION

is this how I'm supposed to wrong answer journal?

I shied away from this answer because I thought the shifting of power from the monarchy to the parliament was a "practical solution" to the problem but not necessarily a "theoretical solution"

Just something stupid I made up in my own head :---)

Had it backwards.

I feel like I'm going a little bit crazy here.

I ruled out A because I believed it offered an alternative reason for why there might be an overall decrease in negative environmental effects of the acid rain, which would therefore weaken the argument that the decrease in acidic pollutants led to the decrease in negative effects.

@ChrisTun That's exactly what caused me to get this question wrong lol

I ruled E out as an option because I assumed that an increased number of police is more likely to correlate with an increase of arrests/identified rate of violent crime. I guess I was supposed to assume the exact opposite?

Hate it. Scream

I missed this question because I wasn’t willing to assume that children being aggressive toward/hitting a doll was necessarily correlated with children hurting other children. This still isn’t making sense to me

@wonderingguy type sh*t

@HannahRodrigue this was a very helpful comment that made the answer make a lot more sense to me. Thank u queen

Submitted the whole drill after only answering the first question because I am an idiot. Hope this helps!

(I did get that question right tho)

I'm confused about C being the answer - the conclusion is about the exaggeration of peasants' piety. Why would I assume the clergy's documentation of a completely different group of people to be representative of their documentation of PEASANTS (a group with presumably less power/ability to correct the record)?

I struggled with this question though I ultimately got it right.

It still just doesn't make sense to me. The music having "much more" in common with jazz still doesn't mean it should be classified as jazz. I guess the point isn't that this is a fantastic argument against the stimulus, its just a "stronger" weakener than all the other options.

took way too long, but I got this thang right

Love that I got this right the first time and then got it wrong in blind review. Genius.

I had B selected as my answer choice and talked myself into answer choice E because it felt like B was introducing information not provided by the stimulus. In hindsight, THAT'S KIND OF THE POINT OF (S)/(w) SOMETIMES.

"If this were true, which one would MOST strengthen/weaken?"

RELEASE THE FIRST 3 SCORES !!!

I hate myself

@ronniseellison I'm not seeing a "quick view" option in 2025 - am I just missing it?

@jordkerns Very helpful assessment ! Thanks!