Anyone else find the wording of this difficult for its difficulty rating? I could not figure what the argument was even getting at on the actual PT

One shotted by an apostrophe...

Simple question that eats a lot of time

Im legolas

Sniped it but damn that is a weird way to write a sentence

whomp whomp

I got it right. Figured almost all is a close stand in for most. Not sure if thats enough but it worked this time.

Easy money SNIPER

Pulled the trigger too fast on this one and now I had to pay. For shame.

I feel like kobe

I got it right but don't really see why its right. It wasn't quite a guess but I couldn't diagram out why its right. It just seems unrelated to the sample.

Finally some good news

It's going well however I think you should create a way for people to drill lawgic itself more.

I am doing well on the drills but I still feel my grasp of lawgic itself is only okay.

So G→B then the contrapositive is /B→/G which does not imply that all brave students are sorted to Gryffindor....is that right?

Is there anyway that we can drill on each of the formal arguments?