It's going well however I think you should create a way for people to drill lawgic itself more.

I am doing well on the drills but I still feel my grasp of lawgic itself is only okay.

One shotted by an apostrophe...

So G→B then the contrapositive is /B→/G which does not imply that all brave students are sorted to Gryffindor....is that right?

Is there anyway that we can drill on each of the formal arguments?

Im legolas

Sniped it but damn that is a weird way to write a sentence

Simple question that eats a lot of time

Anyone else find the wording of this difficult for its difficulty rating? I could not figure what the argument was even getting at on the actual PT

I got it right. Figured almost all is a close stand in for most. Not sure if thats enough but it worked this time.

Easy money SNIPER

Pulled the trigger too fast on this one and now I had to pay. For shame.

I feel like kobe

I got it right but don't really see why its right. It wasn't quite a guess but I couldn't diagram out why its right. It just seems unrelated to the sample.

Finally some good news