So basically it's just POE? It takes too long to map out each question so just knock out the ones that don't match and you're left with the right answer. Probably would be easier to just say that POE is the main way to solve Parallel.
There's probably a better question to highlight the need for the causal logic than this question. This question feels no different than the previous questions in this module. Yet, its after what is suggested to be a slightly different variation.
I think the confusion in this one comes from the conclusion being so general in relation to the premise. The premise and the correct answer has a considerably stronger support than the initial conclusion in the stim.
Sometimes in weaken questions it's better to ignore the conclusion in the stim and just figure out what is the strongest conclusion in the answer choices. Kind of thinking of it like a most strongly supported question in your mind.
This question says throw things considerably harder at children than you think. This is the funniest LSAT question.
I think this one is confusing just because the stimulus doesn't really present a problem on its own. If cops are catching and getting convictions on more car thieves then there are logically less thefts. So you don't really have a logical gap to fill, makes it difficult to find an AC that is really just adding to the stim not filling a gap there.
I got this one right but I strongly considered D, for a different reason than in the explanation. I took it as kind of the same as E. More property damage because there are more people where tornadoes are popping up. That would mean some tornadoes that previously maybe nobody actually saw, unreported, are now seen and reported. I feel like if E didn't explicitly say basically the same thing as my assumption, D still could have been a valid answer choice. I guess my point is, in my head D is only wrong because there is a better answer choice, bot because it's downright wrong.
How do you go about reviewing your wrong answer journal? When do you return to those questions? I'm trying to keep up with it, but I'm not sure what I'm really supposed to do with them when after I've moved on. There are so many more drills, lessons, tests, and questions to do, when do you take time to go back through them?
I’m still not following why we are supposed to assume that the author is incorrect about their assumption that pollution is the primary cause but *correct in their assumption that companies wouldn’t comply. I feel like those are both pretty substantial assumptions and I don’t understand how we are supposed to pick one over the other. The activist presents no evidence that they would definitely not follow any regulations. Can someone explain this any further?
The recommended time on this question is like 30 seconds. It seems impossible to read all that and answer it in that time frame.