Honestly, sometimes if you're struggling its burn out. Take a day, do absolutely nothing or things you like and FEEL NO SHAME ABOUT IT. Give yourself some GRACE and a break. I promise you when you return the next day to study you will feel and see the difference.
I think the confusion in this one comes from the conclusion being so general in relation to the premise. The premise and the correct answer has a considerably stronger support than the initial conclusion in the stim.
Sometimes in weaken questions it's better to ignore the conclusion in the stim and just figure out what is the strongest conclusion in the answer choices. Kind of thinking of it like a most strongly supported question in your mind.
Still confused as to how fear over losing one's job (AC A) is not considered social inertia. If everyone fears losing their job to technology even if said technology may make them more safe and or comfortable the social inertia of people to not lose their jobs causes them to resist the innovations. That would validate the stimulus not weaken it. Even the explanation states social inertia is a desire for things not to change. One losing their job certainly would be a change thus social inertia by that logic would be in fact be desiring not to lose one's job due to tech innovations.
Just confused at how we can draw the line that A's concern is not social inertia when it perfectly fits the bill and definition of social inertia. Would love to hear some takes and opinions on how those who got it right drew a distinction between A and social inertia.
Also please point out any flaws in my understanding. I really want to grasp this!
I was getting these all wrong on the diagnostic test, but haven't gotten one wrong yet here. I was thinking about the questions backwards and trying to undermine premises instead of support. I discounted every single correct answer because I was like 'no, that's just another way to explain this phenomenon; why would that weaken the argument'. It's crazy how just a little clarity on what the test writers are actually asking for can turn a question from impossible to fairly obvious.
I understood answer choice A ("People correctly believe that technical innovations often cause job loss") to be an example of "social inertia", therefore strengthening the argument, which caused me not to choose it. I ended up choosing C, but wasn't confident with this answer either but I'm still having trouble understanding how A weakens the argument???
One reason why A is better than E is because E dissproves and attacks the validity of the presmide along with the hypothesis, while A replaces the hypothesis only, which JY says should be the goal instead of touching the premise. You are not trying to disprove anything, just find an alternative to the hypothesis.
I cannot understand how A doesnt strengthen the argument. If people believe that technological advancement can result in job loss, then they would resist the advancement. That strengthens the argument. What the heck am i missing? #help
I chose B first and then changed it to A, only because I felt that was the next best choice. Even then, choosing A makes no sense to me. I am soooo thrown off my the "correctly." For me, what I understand is that B does not work because the new innovations may not necessarily pose new challenges. My reasoning does not align with the reasoning provided in this lesson :(
For some reason I just understand all the questions in this section more easily than any other section so far. I kind of struggled in the previous sections but now with weakening section I am getting every question right and solving them all in under 1 minute
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
114 comments
Honestly, sometimes if you're struggling its burn out. Take a day, do absolutely nothing or things you like and FEEL NO SHAME ABOUT IT. Give yourself some GRACE and a break. I promise you when you return the next day to study you will feel and see the difference.
I am really struggling with this section
I struggled sooo much with MBT and RRE but am on an honor run with weaken questions--timing and accuracy is near perfect
WE each have our own unique strengths and weaknesses--don't judge yourself by the sections you struggled most on!
lol i had to do a dirty google and figure out wth 'social inertia' is...
man this is the question type i am gonna struggle with
i feel so stupid with how much i've been struggling with this question type 😭 then hearing the explanation makes so much sense i feel silly.
Another correct one in about half the time! That's always encouraging!
I think the confusion in this one comes from the conclusion being so general in relation to the premise. The premise and the correct answer has a considerably stronger support than the initial conclusion in the stim.
Sometimes in weaken questions it's better to ignore the conclusion in the stim and just figure out what is the strongest conclusion in the answer choices. Kind of thinking of it like a most strongly supported question in your mind.
Still confused as to how fear over losing one's job (AC A) is not considered social inertia. If everyone fears losing their job to technology even if said technology may make them more safe and or comfortable the social inertia of people to not lose their jobs causes them to resist the innovations. That would validate the stimulus not weaken it. Even the explanation states social inertia is a desire for things not to change. One losing their job certainly would be a change thus social inertia by that logic would be in fact be desiring not to lose one's job due to tech innovations.
Just confused at how we can draw the line that A's concern is not social inertia when it perfectly fits the bill and definition of social inertia. Would love to hear some takes and opinions on how those who got it right drew a distinction between A and social inertia.
Also please point out any flaws in my understanding. I really want to grasp this!
Thanks!
I was confused by "correctly" in A. I thought that was too big of an assumption. When in the video it says thats what helps makes A correct.
I liked this question. Your explanations of the incorrect answers was really helpful here.
I was getting these all wrong on the diagnostic test, but haven't gotten one wrong yet here. I was thinking about the questions backwards and trying to undermine premises instead of support. I discounted every single correct answer because I was like 'no, that's just another way to explain this phenomenon; why would that weaken the argument'. It's crazy how just a little clarity on what the test writers are actually asking for can turn a question from impossible to fairly obvious.
I got it right but wow A felt like a bait answer.
I understood answer choice A ("People correctly believe that technical innovations often cause job loss") to be an example of "social inertia", therefore strengthening the argument, which caused me not to choose it. I ended up choosing C, but wasn't confident with this answer either but I'm still having trouble understanding how A weakens the argument???
Actively getting my ass handed to me here.
One reason why A is better than E is because E dissproves and attacks the validity of the presmide along with the hypothesis, while A replaces the hypothesis only, which JY says should be the goal instead of touching the premise. You are not trying to disprove anything, just find an alternative to the hypothesis.
Chose A before target time then chose C in blind review :(
Shareholders were not happy with the word "inertia" thrown into this sentence!
Did it in 34 seconds. YAY!
I cannot understand how A doesnt strengthen the argument. If people believe that technological advancement can result in job loss, then they would resist the advancement. That strengthens the argument. What the heck am i missing? #help
I chose B first and then changed it to A, only because I felt that was the next best choice. Even then, choosing A makes no sense to me. I am soooo thrown off my the "correctly." For me, what I understand is that B does not work because the new innovations may not necessarily pose new challenges. My reasoning does not align with the reasoning provided in this lesson :(
Getting crushed by these questions..
I hate these questions.
I got it right at first and then I overthought it and chose B in the blind review.
:(
For some reason I just understand all the questions in this section more easily than any other section so far. I kind of struggled in the previous sections but now with weakening section I am getting every question right and solving them all in under 1 minute