Re answer choice D - are we not able to assume that if throwing faster results in a more accurate throw, it would be easier to catch a ball? Could that be true for the adults throwing the ball to children?
I just wanted to come here and say that I thought self defence meant to defend yourself. So in the case of a ball being thrown at you, if you went into self defence, I thought you would deflect the ball or cover yourself to defend yourself. This is why I got it wrong. Maybe I should of became a neurosurgeon so I knew more about the brain before taking the LSAT.
I'm really starting to get a grasp on good logic from all this LSAT studying. if I want a kid to get better at anything, I gotta trigger the self-defense mechanism. when I have a kid I'll make sure he gets in da octagon with Jon Jones. thanks J.Y.!
As a former elementary PE teacher, I've been saying this for nearly a decade: gotta throw fucking 80+ mph ched at kids, or you are stunting their growth
Anybody else finding the leap from 'self-defense' to 'easy' too big to fathom? That's the reason I didn't select A. I was looking for an answer that has a better explanation (granted there is none) and that's why I knowingly went against A.
Just beam small children so they go into self defense mode lol
22
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
70 comments
noted, next time i play with my nephew i will exclusively be chucking 90mi/hr fast balls
lmao not kevin putting all these one bubble questions at the end of this lesson so we dont give up on our law careers
Ok, these easier questions really help me understand better. And they definitely boost my confidence that I know what I am doing.
I'm gonna train my kid to catch like i'm fuckin Shohei Ohtani
pause
ball
balls
balls
This question says throw things considerably harder at children than you think. This is the funniest LSAT question.
Re answer choice D - are we not able to assume that if throwing faster results in a more accurate throw, it would be easier to catch a ball? Could that be true for the adults throwing the ball to children?
Makes sense
I just wanted to come here and say that I thought self defence meant to defend yourself. So in the case of a ball being thrown at you, if you went into self defence, I thought you would deflect the ball or cover yourself to defend yourself. This is why I got it wrong. Maybe I should of became a neurosurgeon so I knew more about the brain before taking the LSAT.
I'm really starting to get a grasp on good logic from all this LSAT studying. if I want a kid to get better at anything, I gotta trigger the self-defense mechanism. when I have a kid I'll make sure he gets in da octagon with Jon Jones. thanks J.Y.!
Get that baby on the San Francisco Giants. Now.
As a former elementary PE teacher, I've been saying this for nearly a decade: gotta throw fucking 80+ mph ched at kids, or you are stunting their growth
/throwing ched → stunting growth
Thanks for the confirmation, J.Y.!
Anybody else finding the leap from 'self-defense' to 'easy' too big to fathom? That's the reason I didn't select A. I was looking for an answer that has a better explanation (granted there is none) and that's why I knowingly went against A.
Can anyone confirm if this is true or not?
If only questions would be around psychology and children, I’d be safe! 😅
I discarded B based on it explaining slow balls but giving no explanation about fast balls.
I discarded C because it talks about adults but not children.
I discarded D because it talks about tossing balls instead of catching them.
I discarded E because who cares about the limits of fast balls.
Did AttorneyTom write this question? Why are we putting children into self-defense mode? Lol
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
My problem is that i get used to the difficult questions that I then overthink the simplest ones and get the wrong smh
I will test this by throwing an absolute missile at a 10 year old at skyzone
How do we know that the kids respond better in self-defense mode?
their self-defense mode coordination could still be developing, as mentioned in the premise.
do they just magically have an AWAKENING that triggers their physical coordination skills when seeing a fast ball?
Taking it for granted that
(normal motorized coordination)<(self-defense mode) is a stretch.
Just beam small children so they go into self defense mode lol