If there's anybody confused about this, hopefully this can help:

Fact 1: Those who ate curry regularly had higher cognitive scores compared to those who didn't eat curry regularly

Fact 2: Singaporeans of Indian ethnicity had the strongest correlation of Fact 1

Conclusion: It's the turmeric in curry is slowing the cognitive decline

So, we need to know if there's turmeric in the curry that those of Indian ethnicity are eating in order to tie the facts and conclusion

That's where E comes in

(also, it seems you have to do a secondary, back-burner assumption that those of Indian ethnicity are eating Indian curries 🙄)

I'd also like to add that being able to translate the passage into words that you'd use to explain to a 7 year old helps as well! A lot of the jargon in RC is just so flamboyant and unncessary, and I've personally found eliminating that has helped me understand the points of a passage much more effectively

Hidden message in this video is to trust your gut!!! Thanks Kevin, for putting faith in our guts.

Q: Would a viable strategy for a question like this be to eliminate AC's like A and E because we don't necessarily care about any other additional studies besides the one in the stim?

Hi. I'm someone who fell into the trap of B. Would one of the reasons for E being the correct option as opposed to B is because the Ethicist is primarily addressing Gillette? B sounds too generalized and isn't about Gillette

I thought the human error was assuming the automated flight tech is perfect. Maybe that's the human error in and of itself?

So tl;dr, this is basically just ELI5 lol (oh and hey look, I just did a low res summary on this lesson)

@ManusWeber Same!! #2 felt like a trick question with the conclusion indicator words in there. Glad I wasn't the only one who was skeptical with this one.