- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I didnt take "early 18th century" as 1750-1765. I took it as early early 18th century such as 1700-1740 and after that its mid 18th century. FORGET YOU LSAT WRITERS but at least now I know for future questions
from the stimulus, I assumed that all the cattle will have the device because it literally f*ing says that. But I am wrong to assume that the price will change? Where is the line being drawn in what is able to be assumed and what is not?
I understood the stimulus to say that songwriters decline movie sound tracks because they only get one payment compared to music they write on their own that gets played on the radio that generates continued revenue. From the last sentence I didnt get the implication that movie sound tracks were played on the radio frequently.
I was stumped by the rotten premise. Nice to see that it was a trick and I wasn’t just going insane. Will keep an eye out for claims that don’t support the conclusion
How is “unaware” lack of approval and how is it different from disapproval?
My difficulty setting is now 4-5. I keep getting stuck between two answers (usually the most popular answers) and keep choosing the wrong one. What is going onnnnnnn?!!!!! Anyone struggling with this right now? What does it mean and how can I work on fixing it? It’s very discouraging and incredibly frustrating
The wording is so tricky. I had to reread the stimulus to understand what it was saying, but still felt sorta fuzzy. It wasn’t until the explanation that I understood what was being said. How is everyone dealing with the inherently tricky wording?
Hi everyone! I have a neuroscience degree from UC Davis where I graduated with a 2.9. I plan to do an addendum because of undiagnosed adhd and test anxiety. I graduate from my MBA program with 3.8 in the spring and plan to apply for law school in the fall. I have worked for 4 years in the biotechnology industry in the quality department. My diagnostic was a 160 and Im aiming for 170 in June. My advisor told me with my background I would be a good fit for IP law. Im based in northern California but wouldn’t mind a change in scenery. Its hard to see which schools are reachable and super reaches due to my low GPA and mixed background. What does everyone else think my safe, reach, and super reaches schools are? I ultimately want to practice law in California.
I understood what the flaw was (the violence could come from the humans) but how does answer choice A reflect that? The way the answer is worded is not making sense to me..
The stimulus went All-> Most->Most. I looked for the answer choice that went most-> most->all because the answer choices started with the conclusion. Using this method, I found the right answer in time
Did the exact same diagram and GOT IT WRONG WHAT I guess my brain gave up towards the end