Necessary assumptions was challenging, so it's nice to see that it was just one particular unit I was struggling with, and that I was capable of doing this. A nice little confidence booster.
@CollinEsquirol I'm going to try to explain how I thought about this question here! So the phrase we are analyzing is "private ownership of the means of production ultimately destroys any society that sanctions it," which can be found in the first sentence. This sentence begins with the phrase "some people have maintained," so I know it is a concession point (also given that the rest of the argument refutes it). So then, I read the answer choices.
A is wrong because it isn't no more applicable to less technologically advanced societies than to more technologically advanced societies. This is saying it is not applicable equally to either of the societies compared. The argument actually takes a stance on this, and says that this is potentially true of lesstechnologically advanced societies.
B is also wrong because it isn't really a hypothesis, and isn't explained by the argument. It is refuted by the argument!
C is our right answer here because it correctly identifies how the argument suggests this concession point is applicable to the sharing of resources (we see this because the second sentence says it is true of less technologically advanced societies that must share resources to survive, and the answer just condenses this to "sharing of resources"), and only may be true for societies dependent on the introduction of new technologies (which is supported by the 3rd sentence which is a premise).
D is wrong because it isn't incompatible with the needs of any society. The argument admits that it might in fact beapplicable to a less technologically advanced society. Finally, E is wrong because the argument doesn't say that this is true for any society which matches the rest of the answer choice, just that it may be applicable to less tech advanced societies. We don't know what the argument thinks about other societies here, it is out of the scope of the argument!
I somehow just got a 5/5 on this without doing BR after struggling to get any of the practice questions before this correct. idk what just came over me
this is the first multi-drill that I got a 5/5 on! I wholeheartedly prefer figuring out argument structure than anything else. It's refreshing after that nightmare section of SA/NAs
#feedback Ive noticed AP questions generally focus on argument structure; i keep confusing the premise vs conclusion vs intermediate conclusion; i know these are foundational skills so how would you recommend i improve?
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
110 comments
BANG
5/5 but I got almost every single question wrong leading up to the drill. don't understand that lmao
@jackZeitlin I was the opposite of you.
5/5!!! yay It took more time than it should but it is a progress!
5/5 baby!! Less go
4/5 165 equivalent. Cant believe i missed a main conclusion question that was a level 3 SMH. Oh well improvement is improvement.
@TylerMadani021 same lol
3/5 not mad at it tbh I should have had a 4/5 if I did not second guess myself tho smh...
you know what, i got 3/5 at first bc i made really stupid mistakes (i read things too quickly) and when i BRd i got 5/5 so I take it as a win.
5/5 LET'S GOOOOO!!!! 🍾
Necessary assumptions was challenging, so it's nice to see that it was just one particular unit I was struggling with, and that I was capable of doing this. A nice little confidence booster.
4/5 Not bad
4/5 and BR 5/5 yayy! me wants perfect score =(
Can someone explain number 1 to me?
@CollinEsquirol I'm going to try to explain how I thought about this question here! So the phrase we are analyzing is "private ownership of the means of production ultimately destroys any society that sanctions it," which can be found in the first sentence. This sentence begins with the phrase "some people have maintained," so I know it is a concession point (also given that the rest of the argument refutes it). So then, I read the answer choices.
A is wrong because it isn't no more applicable to less technologically advanced societies than to more technologically advanced societies. This is saying it is not applicable equally to either of the societies compared. The argument actually takes a stance on this, and says that this is potentially true of less technologically advanced societies.
B is also wrong because it isn't really a hypothesis, and isn't explained by the argument. It is refuted by the argument!
C is our right answer here because it correctly identifies how the argument suggests this concession point is applicable to the sharing of resources (we see this because the second sentence says it is true of less technologically advanced societies that must share resources to survive, and the answer just condenses this to "sharing of resources"), and only may be true for societies dependent on the introduction of new technologies (which is supported by the 3rd sentence which is a premise).
D is wrong because it isn't incompatible with the needs of any society. The argument admits that it might in fact be applicable to a less technologically advanced society. Finally, E is wrong because the argument doesn't say that this is true for any society which matches the rest of the answer choice, just that it may be applicable to less tech advanced societies. We don't know what the argument thinks about other societies here, it is out of the scope of the argument!
4/5 after flopping on these for so long yay!
4/5 FINALLLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYY
bruh....
2/5 :D
love getting the lowest difficulty question wrong and all the others right :)
I somehow just got a 5/5 on this without doing BR after struggling to get any of the practice questions before this correct. idk what just came over me
Wow, I actually hate this question type!!!
this is the first multi-drill that I got a 5/5 on! I wholeheartedly prefer figuring out argument structure than anything else. It's refreshing after that nightmare section of SA/NAs
Wooo first 5/5 drill!
how do you see the level of the questions?
My first 4/5 on the first try!!!
#feedback Ive noticed AP questions generally focus on argument structure; i keep confusing the premise vs conclusion vs intermediate conclusion; i know these are foundational skills so how would you recommend i improve?
1/5, time for a drill session :p
@rickyrivas94 same i feel so dumb after this module
not knowing the definition of certain words mess me up :(