For NA question just ask yourself what would happen if this answer choice were not true

I think organizing the information in this question was the hardest part. It took me a long time to map everything out, but once I saw it clearly it all made sense

JY's voice dropped 2 octaves this lesson

This is a valid argument

I got the question correct however, I used causal logic instead of conditional logic

Necessary Assumption: At least one person noticed that one "Bonus" PT was off.

Question to 170+ scorers:

How much time did/would you allocate to a question like this?

Answer choice (B) is what I infer lol

I guess it is fair to assume that a Nanobe is at the very least a single-celled creature?

I guess so?!?

When questions trade on assumptions like these it confuses my judgment.

If it was test day should I just circle A and move on?

I got this question right but I have a question about (A) and (C) and assumptions in general:

Nowhere in the stem does it say anything about "exercise" or "healthy diets".

I used my own discretion, and that (D) was a very obvious answer choice, to eliminate those answers. But when is it okay or not okay to bring in my own assumptions?

for real I'm struggling with timing

would it be fair to assume that SA is is somewhat like find the rule but a lot tighter and more exact because it needs to be logically valid?

What's the name of the software that you use to draw on the screen of the question? Also can we use it on test day?

I think it would really help.

I chose (D) but I didn't think of the question as a cost/benefit analysis. I just thought (D) as the only answer that really does something to weaken the argument.

Should I get in the habit of trying to identify whether a question is a cost/benifit?

I don't know why but I have had a much easier time with questions that are 4/5 or 5/5 difficulty but a much harder time with 1/5 and 2/5

I totally confused "and" for "or" on this one. But it makes sense now

Are we using straight-line depreciation?

Most almonds grown in California are produced for domestic consumption. Most almonds grown in California require intense irrigation to produce. Therefore, some almonds produced (forgot to put "in California" here) for domestic consumption require intense irrigation to produce.

Would I be correct in saying "fewer than some is none"

Question 5 should be taken out of your curriculum

@jacoblkessler178 Saying "The man used 7sage and because of this got a 180 on LSAT." requires you to make an assumption that was not explicitly stated