I didn't think that the mention of small/large beaked birds had an impact on the statement given that was never mentioned on the text. This one really confused me

This just confused me more. I wish lessons where a new topic is being introduced had videos

I'm confused because yes, we know Pat is not a member, but it doesnt tell us anything about what non-members can do. so im confused as to why that is the right answer

I am still confused on the difference between explicit and implicit

i confused mental maturity with mental activity thinking that they had just reworded it in the answer choices

i wish we would've gotten a different passages for this approach because i alreayd know what both passages are getting at and what the question answers are.

i wish these were typed out digitally rather than written out. the different colors and animations makes it easier to understand visually

On the LSAT, how would we know when to negate the conclusion (/F -> /Jedi) and how do we know when to negate the whole claim like it does in this lesson?

I'm confused on why it can't be "Not all A are B" instead of bringing some in it

How is 'some' inclusive of ALL? Wouldnt it say 'all' if it included everyone in the sample? Im confused

so confused on #5. any tips are welcome (please)

Can we not put "going to the store" as a superset and "buying milk" as a subset? It is sufficient for you to go to the store to buy milk.

What are some recommendations of websites or places where I can find some readings I should look at? Would love to deepen and strengthen my reading knowledge!

Could someone help me remember/distinguish the difference between pseudo-sufficient assumption and sufficient assumption questions, please?

Are there videos explaining the answers to the 3 questions?

I immediately eliminated answers B through D because I realized the statement was a conclusion given the premise that follows. This statement does not help me explain anything up until that point, but it can be supported by the statement that follows.

I was between answer A and answer E because I knew this was a subsidiary conclusion but I doubet whether it supported the main conclusion. What are some clues or analysis I can do to determine whether one supports the other?

I thought the answer was C since that's what we've been doing for the past few questions... not sure why its not given that it's applying it to the population

i don't understand how this is the right answer. How does this support the fact that reducing class size would not improve achievement? super confused

I got confused and overlooked A because it is refering to "people" as a whoel rather than environmnetalists or technology-related matters

Confused as to why C is irrelevant. I thought it would be the right answer given it says it is for non-financial reasons and they just hired a financial advisor. So regardless of what they do, it won't affect auto maintenance given that it is not done for nonfinancial reasons rather than because of finances, so how would the financial advisor help? This question really confused me. I didn't fully understand the stimulus.