My hypothesis before reading the explanation: Perhaps Detective Conan solves the most difficult of cases while the average detective solves around 35% relatively easy cases.
After reading the explanation: surprised pikachu face
Is there another explanation possible that someone else can think of?
I was very bias about the texts at the beginning too, but after little bit of time and digesting material. You will find these texts very useful. Pls don't skip them. @KevinLin'sOldUserName@J.Y.Ping thx
It would be a nice option to not always have so many acronyms when reading these notes, or to give the option to hover the mouse over it to see the full word.
I feel like the Detective paragraph doesnt work in this example. The fake stimulus doesnt say "a" metric or "The major metric", it says "THE" metric. Meaning this is the way this fake PD works. The niave assumption pitfall doesnt work here because of grammar considerations alone - youre not making an assumption here because the selector is excluding all other factors of success like a weighting criteria or difficulty level criteria. You would literally be having to break the rule presented at the top of the page to not be skeptical. "Your job is to explain the facts, not to deny the facts." it literally says toward the middle.
I grew up in law enforcement and even have two parents that were career detectives, my immediate thought was that some cases are harder than others and are almost 'weighted' differently. But you wouldnt be able to use that train of thought given the rules laid out here and the way this fake stiulus is written.
Please correct the 3rd sentence in the "Deepen the phenomenon" section. It "But we're no longer to an explanation of why his clearance rate is less than half the average" is missing a word between "longer" and "to," such as "looking."
"The correct answer will either explicitly state a fact that will casually explain, partially or fully, the phenomena or it will suggest a causal explanation." - Is casually here intended to be causally?
#feedback May we please make these thingies at the beginning of lessons videos? I find this very hard to digest in one chunk, and I know others feel the same. Thanksss!
44 comments
There should be video for this lesson
dude i want a video... please. Thanks :)
pls someone make a video for this lesson
i wish there was just a video attached to this lesson :/
Good luck
bombaclatttttt gotta go pee before I read all of this
@OmarKouidere just did that lmao
I'm a bit confused - for RRE are we still assuming that everything int he Stimulus is also true? In addition to the AC's? #help
@Isabella! Yes, you would take the premises as true and the correct AC, if true, would explain the phenomena/observations!
My hypothesis before reading the explanation: Perhaps Detective Conan solves the most difficult of cases while the average detective solves around 35% relatively easy cases.
After reading the explanation: surprised pikachu face
Is there another explanation possible that someone else can think of?
If these involve paradoxes, my head is already swirling.. But, I'm ready! lol
Why isnt this a video?!?
Where my april people at???
@Gabero123 YOOOOO
@Gabero123 Whadupppp
@Gabero123 yessirrr
Tangential, but: Cases solved / total cases wouldn’t a higher percentage be better?
video
@LSATDemon the imposter
@VanillaCat haha
Great Explanation, thank you!
I was very bias about the texts at the beginning too, but after little bit of time and digesting material. You will find these texts very useful. Pls don't skip them. @KevinLin'sOldUserName @J.Y.Ping thx
I tried reading a few paragraphs and just figure that I should just move on before I get more confused.
No video???
This just confused me more. I wish lessons where a new topic is being introduced had videos
It would be a nice option to not always have so many acronyms when reading these notes, or to give the option to hover the mouse over it to see the full word.
I feel like the Detective paragraph doesnt work in this example. The fake stimulus doesnt say "a" metric or "The major metric", it says "THE" metric. Meaning this is the way this fake PD works. The niave assumption pitfall doesnt work here because of grammar considerations alone - youre not making an assumption here because the selector is excluding all other factors of success like a weighting criteria or difficulty level criteria. You would literally be having to break the rule presented at the top of the page to not be skeptical. "Your job is to explain the facts, not to deny the facts." it literally says toward the middle.
I grew up in law enforcement and even have two parents that were career detectives, my immediate thought was that some cases are harder than others and are almost 'weighted' differently. But you wouldnt be able to use that train of thought given the rules laid out here and the way this fake stiulus is written.
@Sunday_Blues13 I have no family or experience with law enforcement but I immediately came up with the exact two assumptions the text provided.
@Sunday_Blues13
What is a fake stimulus?
Please correct the 3rd sentence in the "Deepen the phenomenon" section. It "But we're no longer to an explanation of why his clearance rate is less than half the average" is missing a word between "longer" and "to," such as "looking."
"The correct answer will either explicitly state a fact that will casually explain, partially or fully, the phenomena or it will suggest a causal explanation." - Is casually here intended to be causally?
#feedback typo in "is widely considered by his colleagues and the brass to be the best detective on the force."
#feedback May we please make these thingies at the beginning of lessons videos? I find this very hard to digest in one chunk, and I know others feel the same. Thanksss!
Was not expecting to see a Detective Conan reference on my LSAT prep journey, but I love to see it.