Woohoo! Keep it going!! You got this!

I'm interested! I live out in the tri-state area but would be super interested!

@Marcus Tsang Thank you! I'll keep all your advice in mind. Yes, the hard work starts here. Just need to consistently keep at it.

Lots of practice. I mean like lots of it. Take you time too.

If you need to, make some flash cards and drill them so you know your Group 1s, Group 2s, Group 3s, and Group 4s. Consistently practice them so that once you're doing the real questions, you don't just skip over the conditional reasoning in the future.

The more your practice and take it in now, it'll pay off in the long run.

@NathanielWright Remember that we are just trying to answer the questions here, not question the truth of them. Same principle goes for LR where we don't question the truth of premises, we just take them to be true.

In this question, we're just looking for an AC, which is phrased as a question, that the passage can support to answer.

AC A is correct since we can use the passage, specifically the last paragraph, to answer AC A's question.

In all other AC's, the passage cannot be used to answer them.

Let's say you didn't realise this question was a strengthen question. Could you have gone with like a Sufficient Assumption technique to find the Correct AC?

Isn't it more clear that AC A is correct if you think about this as an SA question rather than a Strengthen Q?

Could I have translated "are generally resistant to neither HM Poisoning nor antibiotics" in Answer Choice B as " aren't generally resistant to HM Poisoning and Antibiotics" since "neither... nor" means "not this and not that"? I think I eliminated Answer Choice B because I didn't click in this grammar and then moved on.

@sammeybobammey Yeah I actually have the same reaction. But I looked through this discussion section and other people's explanations and understandings helped me understand this question a lot better!

@Esha Zaveri Woohoo! Same here, thos PAI were def difficult. Just need to improve my timing in the future though!

So just to clarify: if an answer choice contains information that hasn't been discussed in the stimulus or information that we cannot determine whether it is true/could be true/could be false, then that answer choice can be dismissed as not being the POI?

The correct answer choice needs to be one that must be true for one person and must be false for the other person? (as we saw on the MSS Must-be-supported scale?)

@ionicinstinct I see. I guess I can use the addendum to explain, but I'm not sure if admission officers will understand what a 60 (2:1) or 70 (1st) will mean since it's unweighted and has a different scale? Well regardless, it clears one thing up. Just means LSAT score is super important!

@Metroidude

That's super helpful. That emphasizes that I really need to lock in (Capitalise LOCK IN). Thanks for the input Metroidude!!

That was kind of mind blowing. I can see this being super useful in translating (decoding) stimuli and making it simpler for me to understand!

1. Disney Vacation Club offers only 2 ways to get Genie+ pass. So, if Walt didn't get it one way, he must have gotten it through the other way. There is no room for possibility of other methods.

2. Tigers is strong but it can still be challenged. It's not an ironclad argument entirely.

3. Trash Bin is weakest of the three. It has a lot of room for possibility. The premises of"Mr. Fat Cat is perched on the counter or he is licking his paw to clean his face" don't fully increase the strength of support for the conclusion. There are still ways to get to the conclusion, not necessarily by the premises the author provides.

Robin eats cheese excessively. Doctors report that consuming cheddar, a type of cheese, can cause gout. Therefore, Robin could get gout.

Hi everyone! I'm Dais, and I just graduated university. I'm taking a gap year right now and using it to focus mostly on the LSAT. I'm hoping to take it in January 2026, but I might push it back to February! Let me know if you're interested in studying around the NYC area!

Let's get this