User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Joined
Oct 2025
Subscription
Coach

Hello!

I'm studying for the LSAT right now, but to give myself some understanding on the importance of my LSAT score, I thought I would ask this question: How Important is my LSAT Score?

For context, I did my 4 year undergraduate degree in the UK. I took some summer classes at US universities, but those grade outcomes did not impact my 4 year undergraduate degree. I graduated my university with a First Class Honours.

Obviously, I don't expect LSAC or law schools to understand what "First Class Honours" means or why I don't have a GPA. But, if I read correctly, LSAC does rank me in the general GPA scale somewhere between "Superior" and "Above Average".

Now, given these circumstances, how important is my LSAT score then? If I want to increase my chances at T25, does that mean I need to really go high to achieve a high score? Will law schools emphasise the LSAT score over my near-inexistent GPA?

If anyone has any experience with this or knows something, it would be greatly appreciated! I'd like to use this knowledge as another motivation for me to work even harder in LSAT prep.

Thank you!!

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Edited Saturday, Oct 25

That was kind of mind blowing. I can see this being super useful in translating (decoding) stimuli and making it simpler for me to understand!

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Wednesday, Oct 22
  1. Disney Vacation Club offers only 2 ways to get Genie+ pass. So, if Walt didn't get it one way, he must have gotten it through the other way. There is no room for possibility of other methods.

  2. Tigers is strong but it can still be challenged. It's not an ironclad argument entirely.

  3. Trash Bin is weakest of the three. It has a lot of room for possibility. The premises of"Mr. Fat Cat is perched on the counter or he is licking his paw to clean his face" don't fully increase the strength of support for the conclusion. There are still ways to get to the conclusion, not necessarily by the premises the author provides.

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Wednesday, Oct 22

Robin eats cheese excessively. Doctors report that consuming cheddar, a type of cheese, can cause gout. Therefore, Robin could get gout.

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Wednesday, Oct 22

Hi everyone! I'm Dais, and I just graduated university. I'm taking a gap year right now and using it to focus mostly on the LSAT. I'm hoping to take it in January 2026, but I might push it back to February! Let me know if you're interested in studying around the NYC area!

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Wednesday, Oct 22

Let's get this

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Thursday, Nov 13

Let's say you didn't realise this question was a strengthen question. Could you have gone with like a Sufficient Assumption technique to find the Correct AC?

Isn't it more clear that AC A is correct if you think about this as an SA question rather than a Strengthen Q?

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Tuesday, Nov 11

Could I have translated "are generally resistant to neither HM Poisoning nor antibiotics" in Answer Choice B as " aren't generally resistant to HM Poisoning and Antibiotics" since "neither... nor" means "not this and not that"? I think I eliminated Answer Choice B because I didn't click in this grammar and then moved on.

User Avatar
DaisukeKaga
Tuesday, Nov 04

So just to clarify: if an answer choice contains information that hasn't been discussed in the stimulus or information that we cannot determine whether it is true/could be true/could be false, then that answer choice can be dismissed as not being the POI?

The correct answer choice needs to be one that must be true for one person and must be false for the other person? (as we saw on the MSS Must-be-supported scale?)

Confirm action

Are you sure?