@johnward Agreed that confused me. I think they're just saying that the conditional argument follows A--> B, xA, xB. They chose to flip it for the sake of correcting the example but it does not follow the traditional (correct) conditional argument sequence.

I got this question correct, but upon reviewing the answer choices I was wondering why Choice D is not correct. If Succesful Graphic designers has a some relationship with learning trade on the job, isn't answer choice D essentially the same as choice B just for "training on the job". Answer D negates an all statement, so wouldn't it become " Some graphic designers who learn their trade on the job do (will) not ignore clients' wishes." I feel like this is the same as B, which becomes "Some formally trained graphic designers do not ignore clients' wishes." I completley understand why B is correct, however I am confused as to why D is wrong?

Why is "a relationship" not the object of section 5, but for question three the whole clause starting with "Billboards" is the object?

@ShortBee Same, I highlighed fail to kill as the entire predicate.

@KeziaH19 same here