186 comments

  • 18 hours ago

    5/5

    1
  • 2 days ago

    I was so lost on the first one and then I was locked in the rest.

    2
  • Meow

    1
  • 4 days ago

    5/5

    1
  • 4 days ago

    First time 5/5

    1
  • 5 days ago

    I think it helped once I realized that the filtered sentence could be stupid.

    3
  • 5 days ago

    Question 3 was the one that got me, I thought black holes would've been the object.

    6
  • 6 days ago

    this cooked me so bad...

    0
  • Sunday, Jul 5

    was doing so good but then instead of the spirit i said the era im so unlocked

    3
  • Sunday, Jul 5

    Im getting fried on these

    2
  • Saturday, Jul 4

    5/5 yay!!

    1
  • Sunday, Jun 28

    5/5 :))

    1
  • Sunday, Jun 21

    4/5. I got confused on Q3 i thought that black holes was a predicate but the comments explained by it wasn't

    2
  • Friday, Jun 19

    for #4 i'm kinda confused on why "during his presidency" is modfying "expanded" and not "Thomas Jefferson"?

    1
    Thursday, Jul 2

    @iynur The expansion occurred during his presidency, therefore "during his presidency" would be elaborating on the time frame of the expansion rather than TJ himself.

    1
  • Wednesday, Jun 17

    5/5 :-)

    3
  • Tuesday, Jun 9

    ugh idk why im hating this so much.. idk if its cuz i didnt pay attention to this stuff when i was younger but it feels like such a drag! i will skip this and come back

    2
  • Monday, Jun 8

    4/5

    1
  • Friday, May 29

    I'm not quite understanding how black holes are not an object?

    10
    Saturday, Jun 6

    @NoaF123 Same. He quickly went through that one with no explanation.

    3
    Friday, Jun 19

    @NoaF123 I got it wrong too but i'm wondering if the kernel is just the "physicists were puzzled" and what the physicists were puzzled by is the existence of black holes as a modifier?

    3

    @NoaF123 I gotchu twin! I've been reading grammar books for fun for years now lol: the whole point of the 'black holes' sub-clause is to enunciate the larger clause from which it derives, in this case, the existence. This is primarily because if we strip the sentence all the way down and we're just left with the bare bones, the existence is all we need to know at a basic level. Of course, all the black holes do here is just give us details about what was so 'puzzling' for 'physicists' regarding "the existence" of something in the first place. If that makes any sense? If not, I can always reply here and do a little less jargon-esque response lol.

    1
  • Friday, May 29

    could someone explain why in q5 the predicate object is the spirit and not the elizabethan era? I am kind of confused about the hard and fast rules of modifier vs object

    1
    Friday, May 29

    @AvaHosseini He did not capture the Elizabethan era, he captured the spirit of the era.

    3
  • Wednesday, May 27

    is it possible that for question 5, the writings could be the subject? after all what is the piece of text talking about? -- its these writings and they add the detail that these writings belong to William Shakespeare. Could anyone also see this line of thinking?

    1
  • Tuesday, May 26

    5/5 Being an ESL teacher comes in handy

    3
  • Monday, May 25

    Billy Shakespeare 😂

    3
  • Monday, May 25

    kernels gang up 5/5

    4
  • Sunday, May 17

    For Q2, why is it “the rain” and not just “rain”? Nonetheless, I did pretty good on this.

    6
  • Wednesday, May 13

    5/5

    2

Confirm action

Are you sure?