- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
#feedback the lawhub review is dated here - pretty sure the blue highlights are gone as mentioned by Kevin on the podcast
@Jaskaran5262 The Daily Logic Links are fun and have been a good way to really sharpen conditional logic if its something you find yourself doing mental gymnastics on frequently
Is steel-manning a genuine flaw that we can expect to run into on the LSAT?
Am I wrong that a majority owner can hold less than 50%? I understand why D is wrong completely, as that would require far too many unjustified assumptions, but is it not incorrect to say that 49% would be the absolute limit after acquiring all other minority shares. I got this question right, just want to clarify the language of "majority".
@DannyH28 Additionally you can replace restaurants in my explanation with any public place and the logic still holds. Replace restaurants with Parks, Courts, Govt. Offices etc.
@BrydenSolonar I initially selected AC C before blind review, this is how I understand it. Yes, all coffeehouses are public places, but the stimulus reads "All coffeehouses AND restaurants are public places". Now, what if there are only 3 coffee shops and 40 restaurants? If all of the restaurants are well-designed and feature artwork, the rule that 'most well designed public places feature artwork' still holds, without necessitating that most (or any for that matter) coffeehouses feature artwork.
How does the timing work for these? Is the time-elapsed stamp shown by the passage factoring in the question time, or would I have to sum them up to see the whole passage+questions time