Is it wrong to assume in Q2 AC A is too broad as well because it says "Animals" As opposed to the reptile in question? It feels like a subtlety that the argument is not as broad as AC A makes it out to be?

@18lwood130 exactly my thoughts too.

I took D as the AC cause of the jump from "reducing spending" to "excessive spending". It felt like the Argument was making the opponents views more extreme. I didn't choose A bc of the fact that the last sentence bacially says its unwarranted to reduce spending

THis makes no sense

I work for big tech; FAANG type. Its IMPOSSIBLE to manage, and i'm burnt out. But doing my best to make it to the exam Saturday.

B is such BS. there's no way to say A is right but B is wrong; the same argument can be made for both. Whether giving money to debts or more logically if the broader job market is f'd you're supporting someone else. Shit question, and even worse explanation by 7sage

@CodyLevant lolololol

AC D was tripping me up cause I didn't read the word "ALLOW", and assumed in the fast read of the AC that it was strictly 30%; as opposed to 30% being allowed. This makes sense high level too, if it wasn't allowed in a regulated industry it wouldnt make sense.

what a time suck on the test.

thought AC A was a form of Social inertia.

the brackets in AC B "While Effective" was overlooked when I did this and caused me to make a mistake. If I had read those 2 words more closely this would have made more sense, the only 2 contending choices were A and B, and this would have pushed A up.