#feedback

i think there is a typo in the explanation of answer choice B. "central purpose of passage B is to find fault with author B’s way of approaching his argument. She thinks that author B is too extreme in his dismissal of historical approaches..."

I believe the bolded portions are meant to say Author A

#feedback

it would be helpful to see an argument that is NOT valid. So we could see an example of how an invalid argument would be fed to us on the LSAT.

#help

so i just want to be clear that this does not mean p>c as well as c>p

if it is a pet, then it is a cat,

if it is a cat, then it is a pet.

the <s> does not translate into if/then?

Scored a 155 in June, but retaking in October looking to work up to 160s, interested in joining if you aren't capped yet!

I'm in Vegas, but do you have a discord or something set up?