User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Joined
Jul 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
159
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
Ilovethistest
6 days ago

@danjpeach96 the conclusion is “the attempt to contain the outbreak failed.” Have to separate the premise which is indicated by “because.”

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Monday, Apr 13

It has a premise and conclusion, so yes. If it only had the conclusion, it would simply be a claim.

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Friday, Apr 10

Scores vary. Just go in and expect you’re going to score the best you’ve ever scored

3
PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q24
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Monday, Mar 23

Really thought I understood de Morgan's law fully but I guess I don't. I understand we get

cap AND (inj OR 500) --> report... totally get that. Then we see we fail the necessary, so obviously I'm looking to just get the contrapositive in the answer so I made:

not report --> incap OR (not inj AND not 500).. but the video makes not report --> incap OR (not inj OR not 500) and keeps the or the same from the original sufficient condition?? my question is why does the "and" connection between the "unless" clause and the original sufficient get switched from AND to OR when switching to the contrapositive but the original sufficient conditions "or" (inj OR 500), doesn't switch to and?? I get the first switch due to de Morgan's but not making this second switch from or to and seems like it goes against de Morgan's law?? Just want to make sure my diagramming is flawless.

1
PrepTests ·
PT159.S3.Q18
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Tuesday, Mar 17

@Ilovethistest Granted I didn't even think of this till I was reviewing this after the test, and I realize I'm being very clingy to strict logical rules, but technically wash --> sometimes howl is what Es conclusion would translate to.

1
PrepTests ·
PT159.S3.Q18
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Tuesday, Mar 17

I don't understand how we're saying Es conclusion and stimulus conclusion are different. I realize the explanation is saying that E's conclusion creates benefit --> sometimes prefer, due to the group 1 "anyone" but stimulus conclusion has a logical indicator that I feel could create wash --> sometimes howl which would match E. I realize "must" and "anyone" are different but they're both still conditional indicators. I feel like if stimulus conclusion truly matched C it would just say "so Jack's dog sometimes howls while he's washing it." Why is stimulus conclusion allowed to have "must" yet match C and not E?

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Monday, Mar 16

@Ilovethistest actually after review I made a lot of mistakes and the sections kind of do seem more normal than i thought.

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Wednesday, Mar 11

@rijjibear worst PT I’ve ever taken

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Tuesday, Mar 3

I was surprised to score my best practice test score on the actual. I think it depends on the type of person probably.

1
User Avatar
Ilovethistest
Tuesday, Mar 3

There’s not a ton of upside to canceling a score. Only way I could see it being helpful is if you took it the second time and scored lower, then I’d seriously consider hiding it. But if you do actually get 164-168 next time, they will take the highest score and will see improvement which they’ll respect.

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?