This one was very confusing to me as I thought the conclusion was just a given fact. To me, this stem was missing an argument/conclusion...

Personally, physically writing certain things down helped me focus in on the content. I have never went back to refer the notes, as I have the original content here, but I do feel the process of the note taking helped my retention of the material.

Yes, but I wish it was more clear where the data was coming from. Additionally, I wish it was more dynamic comparing PT, drills, sections, etc... in a "togglable" format.

@MicaylaCx If you meant "take my time," then same. I continuously eliminate an answer choice because a misread one word. For example, in Q1 I eliminated answer A because I missed (internalizing) the words "only those." This led me to struggle with the other answers being correct (because they weren't). But, during blind review I immediately saw the mistake and knew it was correct. I need to slow down - but then I was over 6 - 31 seconds on 3/5 of the questions already...

Honestly, when I first read the stems, I was trying to rush it and didn't really understand what it was about. Ended up just seeing answer D had a lot of the same wording and went with it. But, in blind review, I took the time to deep dive the grammar and it helped immensely. I immediately knew what the right answer was after taking a few more seconds to understand each sentence. I need to slow down on these more complex questions as I usually get extra time from the simple ones.

Why is the lawgic not A and B <-s-> A and C?

@mini We don't know that she will give her speech no matter what. We only know that she cannot give it unless the assassination fails (SAS -> AAF). What if she just decides to not give the speech? Or, what if she trips and hits her head and is incapacitated prior to giving the speech? Because we do not know the speech is guaranteed to happen, then we cannot automatically say that Chancellor Palpatine's vote will not pass (/P). Perhaps if there was another premise that stated: "If the assassination fails, then Senator Amidala must give her speech" (AAF -> SAS). That would make the speech necessary to happen because the assassination failed.