This is the one question I got wrong. And I got it wrong twice. I get it now that I read it again, but it's still an absolutely awful question. I think it's the wording of Answer Choice B that stunted me.

Went a minute over time, but I got it right! Once I mapped it out, and read B, I didn't need to read anything else.

I don't exactly know how, but as soon as I landed on B, and re-read the statements, it's like I didn't even need to look at the others. It just made sense with how the conditional logic flowed downstream, so to speak.

@Super_Cookie That's why it took me 20 seconds over the time to answer it. I kept thinking, "Surely it's not that simple..."

5/5. The most difficult questions I completed well under time, but the easiest ones, I went over time.

Whoever wrote this question is a monster, lol.

5/5!

Got it right, but was 20 seconds over. These have always been my weakness. It's like, "That makes sense, but let me read through the others first, just in case." So I take too long.

Got this one with 18 seconds to spare. Heck yeah!

11/12 ain't bad. That was actually a fun exercise!

It helps that I'm a Star Wars fan, so this was an easy example, ha. The Force is a necessary condition. Just because you can use the Force, doesn't mean you are a Jedi. The Sith and the Witches of Dathomir also use the Force.

Visualizing the subset and superset really helped me with this one.

Got it wrong, then tried diagramming for the blind review, and got it right through process of elimination. BC <-s-> PC -> pompous -> irritating.

E. Irritating + beautiful cats -> /PC

Stimulus contrapositive: /irritating -> /pompous -> /PC

All of the other answers work with the stimulus and its contrapositive, E does not.

I should have slowed down and mapped it out.

Took a bit longer than I should have, but I got it! Had to diagram.

3/5 on the initial, 5/5 on the BR. It's scary looking back and seeing how easily I missed the answers, and they were staring me in the face. Especially #5.

4/5 on Actual, 3/5 on Blind Review. I shouldn't have second-guessed myself on #3, I had it right. #2 vexed me.

Luckily, this one was pretty easy. You should buy the vase ONLY if you can validate it's authenticity. If you are buying something over the internet, that's more difficult. So Maltilde should not do it.

1275. I'll take it.

@cmata Same, same.

Wow, that was surprisingly easy.

@Marlowsteed I think the easiest way to identify Group 4 is any word that is a straight up "no" or a word that indicates that something cannot happen.

Ah, my greatest weakness. Confusing necessary for sufficient. Being the necessary condition cannot trigger the sufficient condition. I guessed wrong, and then when the presentation visualized it, I had to smack my forehead.

Definitely one of my biggest traps on the LSAT. Basically, when it comes to supersets, it's necessary to be part of a subset, but that doesn't mean that you are in the discussed subset. Like, I can be a student at a university (superset), but that doesn't mean that I am part of the university's chess club (subset).

Ah, the good ol' coffee shop question. I got it right, but I was over time.

4/5 for Actual, 3/5 for BR. Didn't trust myself with answer B (got it right on Actual) in BR for Question 1. Never got 4 right. That one was a doozy.