I’m taking the LSAT in October and looking to meet virtually about once a week. I’m open to meeting in person if you’re in Houston, and we can increase frequency as the test gets closer if the fit is good.

What I’m looking for:

• Someone who is actively studying for the LSAT

• No minimum score required

• Preferably someone who has taken the LSAT at least once or has completed some timed sections/PTs

• Someone open to verbally working through questions out loud

• Someone willing to explain their reasoning, hear other people’s reasoning, and teach concepts back

• Someone collaborative, humble, and consistent

• Bonus if you’re already scoring in the 160s+ and are open to teaching/explaining concepts, especially if you’re stuck and want to use teach-back as a way to break through your plateau. 

The learning style I’m looking for is very discussion-based. I do not want a silent study room where we just sit there independently. I’m looking for people who want to talk through Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, blind review, wrong answers, traps, question stems, and why certain answers work or fail.

The goal is not ego, competition, or hierarchy. The goal is to build a serious, collaborative study space where we can sharpen each other.

My general availability:

• Weekdays after work. I work 8:00–5:00 CST and am realistically home around 7:00 p.m.

• Saturdays after 1:00 p.m.

• Sundays are flexible

If interested, please comment or message me with:

1. When you’re taking the LSAT

2. Whether you’ve taken it before or completed any PTs

3. Your current score range, if you’re comfortable sharing

4. Your strongest and weakest LSAT areas

5. Your field of legal interest

6. Your general availability

7. Whether you’re open to verbally explaining questions and teaching concepts back

No games, no ego. If you’re not humble, collaborative, or willing to talk through reasoning, this probably is not the group for you.

What’s up, I’m building a tight, high-accountability LSAT study crew focused on LR + RC improvement. I’m testing Jan 10, but open to Jan/Feb/March test-takers who are consistent, serious, and want to grow.

About Me:

Current PT: ~148 and rising (LawHub/7Sage)

Strengths: breaking down logic in real time, mapping RC passages, live feedback

Weaknesses: timing, drilling key LR types

Schedule: rotating work shifts, but can do 4 sessions/week (mix of afternoons/evenings, can coordinate)

Looking for Partners Who:

Can commit to 4x/week, 1–1.5 hr sessions

Are comfortable thinking out loud, open to pushback, and want to get better (not just “be right”)

Know the basics (argument structure, major LR types, RC flow)

Want a small, consistent group (Houston area or virtual)

Session Format:

Quick warm-up

Timed LR/RC drill

Breakdown & live feedback

“Hot seat” — everyone explains their logic and gets real-time critique

DM Me With:

1. Your test date & PT range

2. Biggest LR/RC struggles

3. What you want from the group

4. What you bring (energy, structure, humor, whatever)

We’ll do a quick intro call, lock in core times, and get to work. Let’s break plateaus and get those scores up.

You can also DM me at Founder@TheNarrativeProjectHouston.onmicrosoft.com