What makes the tiger argument not as strong as the Disney argument

For question 5, I got the answer, but not in the way the video describes. I did this:

AO AO AO AO AO

PC PC PC

LH LH

(AO = Attacking owners, PC = Pet Cats, LH = Loving Home)

By doing this I concluded that some pets who live in loving homes fantasize about attacking their owners. Could anyone confirm if this method is also correct?

#Help

Why couldn't the conclusion be "Most B's are C's?"

I'm trying to visualize it with the buckets.

I have a question: couldn't D technically be the right answer if we just negated the other part of the sentence? It would turn into: people who understand musical roots --> good show. Wouldn't that fall in line with what we diagrammed and thus be the right answer?